Abstract:Context: Accurate and precise monitoring practises are key for effective wildlife conservation management; providing reliable estimates of spatiotemporal changes in species abundance on which sound decision-making can be based. Advancements in drone and satellite technology are providing new standards for survey accuracy and precision and have great potential for enhancing population monitoring of numerous difficult to survey species. Flying-foxes ( Pteropus spp.) are large bats that roost in groups of a few hundred to many thousands in the canopies of trees, where they are difficult to census accurately and precisely by human observers. Globally, 35 of the 64 flying-fox species are listed as threatened under the IUCN Red List of Threatened Species, and reliable monitoring methods are needed for the effective management of this ecologically important group. Aims: Recently, we showed that drone-acquired thermal imagery can be used to count flying-foxes in their roost with high accuracy and precision. In the present study, we aimed to assess the accuracy and precision of whole colony counts derived from ground-based counting methods against reference counts derived from drone-acquired thermal imagery. Methods: We evaluated the relationship between ground-based counts by two groups of human observers to highly accurate and precise counts derived from drone-acquired thermal orthomosaics for 25 counts conducted across seven flying-fox roosts throughout the Greater Sydney region, Australia. Key results: We found that ground-based counts by human observers were positively correlated with those obtained from concurrent drone-acquired thermal imagery. However, drone-acquired estimates of colony size were 2.05 and 1.92 times higher than ground-based counts by the experimenter and Australian government counters respectively. When compared against drone-acquired reference counts, the precision (coefficient of variation) of ground-based counts was 26.3% when conducted by a single counter and 55.1% when conducted by multiple counters. Conclusions: Our research indicates that ground-based counting methods underestimate true population sizes by substantial margins and have limited precision. Drone-based monitoring provides highly accurate and precise population estimates, and thus is expected to yield more reliable information on flying-fox abundance and allow for trends to be established over shorter timescales. Implications: Using ground counting methods alone, population trends can only be established with significance after protracted periods of monitoring. Incorporating the use of thermal drones into current monitoring practises would enhance the capacity to detect population trends earlier and more accurately, so that conservation management can more effectively respond.

Improved absolute abundance estimates from spatial count data with simulation and microfossil case studies

Use of an Improved High-Throughput Absolute Abundance Quantification Method to Characterize Soil Bacterial Community and Dynamics

Methods Employed in Species Diversity Determination of Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi (AMF) Colonized in Terrestrial Ecosystem

Expressing Lead Isotopic Compositions by Fractional Abundances for Environmental Source Apportionment.

Quantitative assessment of reef foraminifera community from metabarcoding data

Replicate DNA metabarcoding can discriminate seasonal and spatial abundance shifts in river macroinvertebrate assemblages

Absolute quantitation of microbiota abundance in environmental samples

Integrating counts from rigorous surveys and participatory science to better understand spatiotemporal variation in population processes

An easily implemented single‐visit survey method for intermittently available and imperfectly detectable wildlife applied to the Florida east coast diamondback terrapin (Malaclemys terrapin tequesta)

Counting with DNA in metabarcoding studies: How should we convert sequence reads to dietary data?

Estimating Abundance from Counts in Large Data Sets of Irregularly-Spaced Plots using Spatial Basis Functions

AbundanceR: A Novel Method for Estimating Wildlife Abundance Based on Distance Sampling and Species Distribution Models

Estimating abundance of unmarked animal populations: accounting for imperfect detection and other sources of zero inflation

Quantifying the utilisation of blue, green and brown resources by riparian predators: A combined use of amino acid isotopes and fatty acids

Ground-based counting methods underestimate true numbers of a threatened colonial mammal: an evaluation using drone-based thermal surveys as a reference

Unveiling rare diversity by integrating museum, literature, and field data

Novel Methods of Estimating Relative Pollen Productivity: A Key Parameter for Reconstruction of Past Land Cover from Pollen Records

Faecal source apportionment using molecular methods: A proof of concept using the FEAST algorithm

Theory and application of an improved species richness estimator

Quantitative insights into osteocyte density developmental patterns in fossilized bone — A new method

A framework for modeling the impacts of adaptive search intensity on the efficiency of abundance surveys