DevBench: A multimodal developmental benchmark for language learning

Alvin Wei Ming Tan,Sunny Yu,Bria Long,Wanjing Anya Ma,Tonya Murray,Rebecca D. Silverman,Jason D. Yeatman,Michael C. Frank

2024-06-15

Abstract:How (dis)similar are the learning trajectories of vision-language models and children? Recent modeling work has attempted to understand the gap between models' and humans' data efficiency by constructing models trained on less data, especially multimodal naturalistic data. However, such models are often evaluated on adult-level benchmarks, with limited breadth in language abilities tested, and without direct comparison to behavioral data. We introduce DevBench, a multimodal benchmark comprising seven language evaluation tasks spanning the domains of lexical, syntactic, and semantic ability, with behavioral data from both children and adults. We evaluate a set of vision-language models on these tasks, comparing models and humans not only on accuracy but on their response patterns. Across tasks, models exhibit variation in their closeness to human response patterns, and models that perform better on a task also more closely resemble human behavioral responses. We also examine the developmental trajectory of OpenCLIP over training, finding that greater training results in closer approximations to adult response patterns. DevBench thus provides a benchmark for comparing models to human language development. These comparisons highlight ways in which model and human language learning processes diverge, providing insight into entry points for improving language models.

Computation and Language,Machine Learning

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The main problem this paper attempts to address is the exploration of the similarities and differences between visual-language models and children's development in language learning. Specifically:

1. **Data Efficiency Gap**: Although modern machine learning models can acquire certain human language features, the amount of training data they require is much greater than the amount needed for natural human language learning. The paper aims to understand the nature of this "data gap" and explore how to narrow it by building models trained on less data.

2. **Multimodal Benchmarking**: Existing evaluations of multimodal models are typically based on adult-level benchmarks, lacking direct comparisons to children's language development. Therefore, the authors introduce DEVBENCH, a multimodal benchmark set comprising 7 tasks that cover lexical, syntactic, and semantic abilities, and include behavioral data from both children and adults.

3. **Comparison of Model and Human Behavior Patterns**: By comparing the performance patterns (not just accuracy) of models and humans on different tasks, the paper reveals the strengths and weaknesses of models in the language learning process, providing insights for further improvement of language models.

4. **Analysis of Model Training Trajectories**: By analyzing the performance changes of the OpenCLIP model during the training process, the study finds that more training makes the model's performance closer to adult behavior patterns, which helps to understand the relationship between the model and human language development trajectories.

In summary, this paper aims to provide new methods and tools for understanding and improving the language learning capabilities of visual-language models by introducing the DEVBENCH benchmark set, especially in terms of the differences and similarities in mimicking the human language learning process.