Abstract:Speculative execution attacks exploiting speculative execution to leak secrets have aroused significant concerns in both industry and academia. They mainly exploit covert or side channels over microarchitectural states left by mis-speculated and squashed instructions (i.e., transient instructions). Most such attacks target cache states. Existing cache-based defenses against speculative execution attacks fall into two categories, Invisible and Undo. Most Invisible defenses buffer execution metadata of speculative instructions and place them into the cache only if the speculatively executed instructions become determined. Motivated by the fact that mis-speculations are rare cases, Undo defenses allow speculative instructions to modify cache states. Upon a mis-speculation, they rollback cache states to the ones prior to the execution of transient instructions. However, Invisible defenses have been recently found insecure by the speculative interference attack. This calls for a deep security inspection of Undo defenses against speculative execution attacks. In this paper, we present unXpec as the first attack against Undo-based safe speculation. It exploits the secret-dependent timing channel exhibited through the rollback operations of Undo defenses. Specifically, the rollback process requires both invalidating cache lines brought into the cache by transient instructions and restoring evicted cache lines from the cache by transiently loaded data. This opens up a channel that encodes secret via the timing difference between when rollback involves much invalidation and restoration or not. We further leverage eviction sets to enforce more restoration operations. This yields a longer rollback time and thus a larger secret-dependent timing difference. We demonstrate the timing channel over the open-source CleanupSpec, a representative Undo solution. A single transient load can trigger a secret-dependent timing difference of 22 cycles (without eviction sets) of 32 cycles (with eviction sets), which is sufficiently exploitable for constructing a covert channel for speculative execution attacks. We run unXpec on the gem5 simulator with CleanupSpec enabled. The results show that unXpec can leak secrets at a high rate of 140 Kbps with an accuracy over 90%. Simply enforcing constant-time rollback to mitigate unXpec may induce an over 70% performance overhead.

TikTag: Breaking ARM's Memory Tagging Extension with Speculative Execution

Color My World: Deterministic Tagging for Memory Safety

CoMeT: Configurable Tagged Memory Extension

MIPE: a Practical Memory Integrity Protection Method in a Trusted Execution Environment.

Dtee: A Declarative Approach to Secure IoT Applications Using TrustZone

MPTEE: Bringing Flexible and Efficient Memory Protection to Intel SGX

TMAC: Taint-based memory protection via access control

PACMem: Enforcing Spatial and Temporal Memory Safety via ARM Pointer Authentication

unXpec: Breaking Undo-based Safe Speculation

MECAT: Memory-Safe Smart Contracts in ARM TrustZone

PACSafe: Leveraging ARM Pointer Authentication for Memory Safety in C/C++

Uncovering and Exploiting AMD Speculative Memory Access Predictors for Fun and Profit

Bypassing memory safety mechanisms through speculative control flow hijacks

MVAM: Multi-variant Attacks on Memory for IoT Trust Computing

SMoTherSpectre: exploiting speculative execution through port contention

MTSan: A Feasible and Practical Memory Sanitizer for Fuzzing COTS Binaries

CryptSan: Leveraging ARM Pointer Authentication for Memory Safety in C/C++

Leveraging Hardware Transactional Memory for Cache Side-Channel Defenses.

From Speculation to Security: Practical and Efficient Information Flow Tracking Using Speculative Hardware

Leaky MDU: ARM Memory Disambiguation Unit Uncovered and Vulnerabilities Exposed.

From Speculation to Security