HiFAST : An HI Data Calibration and Imaging Pipeline for FAST II. Flux Density Calibration

Ziming Liu,Jie Wang,Yingjie Jing,Zhi-Yu Zhang,Chen Xu,Tiantian Liang,Qingze Chen,Ningyu Tang,Qingliang Yang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1674-4527/ad5398

2024-09-03

Abstract:Accurate flux density calibration is essential for precise analysis and interpretation of observations across different observation modes and instruments. In this research, we firstly introduce the flux calibration model incorporated in HIFAST pipeline, designed for processing HI 21-cm spectra. Furthermore, we investigate different calibration techniques and assess the dependence of the gain parameter on the time and environmental factors. A comparison is carried out in various observation modes (e.g. tracking and scanning modes) to determine the flux density gain ($G$), revealing insignificant discrepancies in $G$ among different methods. Long-term monitoring data shows a linear correlation between $G$ and atmospheric temperature. After subtracting the $G$--Temperature dependence, the dispersion of $G$ is reduced to $<$3% over a one-year time scale. The stability of the receiver response of FAST is considered sufficient to facilitate HI observations that can accommodate a moderate error in flux calibration (e.g., $>\sim5\%$) when utilizing a constant $G$ for calibration purposes. Our study will serve as a useful addition to the results provided by Jiang et al. (2020). Detailed measurement of $G$ for the 19 beams of FAST, covering the frequency range 1000 MHz -- 1500 MHz can be found on the HIFAST homepage: <a class="link-external link-https" href="https://hifast.readthedocs.io/fluxgain" rel="external noopener nofollow">this https URL</a>.

Instrumentation and Methods for Astrophysics

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The problem that this paper attempts to solve is: in order to ensure that the observational data of FAST (Five - hundred - meter Aperture Spherical radio Telescope) can be accurately analyzed and interpreted under different observational modes and instruments, accurate flux density calibration needs to be achieved. Specifically, the authors developed and integrated a data - processing pipeline module named HiFAST, which is specifically used for the flux density calibration of FAST observational data, and evaluated its performance.

### Main problem decomposition

1. **Importance of flux density calibration**:
- Flux density calibration is particularly important for high - sensitivity single - dish telescopes, especially when conducting large - scale H I surveys.
- The existing open - source data - processing pipelines for FAST lack a systematic flux density calibration procedure.

2. **Influence of different observational modes**:
- The authors studied the influence of different observational modes (such as tracking, scanning, etc.) on the flux density gain ($G$).
- They compared the gain differences between different methods and found that the gain parameter $G$ has a very small difference (<2%) between different methods, but there are large fluctuations in long - term observations.

3. **Influence of environmental factors**:
- Long - term monitoring data show that the gain parameter $G$ is linearly correlated with the atmospheric temperature.
- After correcting for temperature dependence, the dispersion of $G$ on a one - year time scale is reduced to <3%.

4. **Long - term stability**:
- Through long - time - series observations, the long - term changes of the gain parameter $G$ were studied, and it was found that it is significantly affected by seasonal factors.
- Polynomial regression was used to analyze the relationship between $G$ and the observation time, and the influence of the atmospheric temperature on $G$ was further explored.

### Key formulas

- Flux density calibration formula:
\[
G(\nu)=\frac{T_{\text{SRC}}^a(\nu)-T_{\text{REF}}^a(\nu)}{S_c(\nu)}
\]
where $T_{\text{SRC}}^a$ and $T_{\text{REF}}^a$ are the antenna temperatures of the source area and the reference area respectively, and $S_c(\nu)$ is the known flux density.

- Temperature correction formula:
\[
G_{\text{cor}}(\nu)=G(\nu)+s(\nu)\Delta T
\]
where $s(\nu) = 4.7\times 10^{-5}\nu - 1.4\times 10^{-3}$, and $\Delta T$ is the difference between the observed temperature and the standard temperature.

Through these studies, the authors provide reliable methods and data support for the flux density calibration of FAST, which helps to improve the data accuracy and reliability of FAST in various observational modes.