Abstract:Deep neural networks (DNNs) have achieved state-of-the-art performance in various learning tasks, such as computer vision, natural language processing, and speech recognition. However, the fundamental theory of generalization still remains obscure in deep learning-why DNN models can generalize well, despite that they are heavily overparametrized in both depth and width? Recently, some work shows that traditional theory of analyzing the generalization error of learning models fails to explain the generalization of DNNs. The failure is mainly because of one simple fact that the worse case analysis of generalization error for learning models would be too loose for models with large parameter space, such as DNNs. In this work, we propose a new analysis of generalization in DNNs from an optimal transport perspective. Unlike traditional worse-case uniform convergence analysis in learning theory, our analysis of generalization error is dependent on both the learning algorithm and the data distribution and is the average-case analysis. Thus, our theory can be more practical and accurate to describe the generalization behavior of DNNs. More specifically, in this article, we try to answer a fundamental yet unsolved question in deep learning-why deeper models can generalize well than shallow models? The main contribution of this article can be summarized in four aspects. First, under a general learning framework, we derive upper bounds on the generalization error of learning algorithms by their algorithmic transport cost: the expected Wasserstein distance between the output hypothesis and the output hypothesis conditioned on an input example. We further provide several upper bounds on the algorithmic transport cost in terms of total variation distance, relative entropy, and Vapnik-Chervonenkis (VC) dimension. Moreover, we also study different conditions for loss functions under which the generalization error of a learning algorithm can be upper bounded by different probability metrics between distributions relating to the output hypothesis and/or the input data. Finally, under our established framework, we obtain our main results, showing that the generalization error in DNNs decreases exponentially to zero as the number of layers increases.

Loss Gradient Gaussian Width based Generalization and Optimization Guarantees

Optimization and Generalization Guarantees for Weight Normalization

High Probability Guarantees for Nonconvex Stochastic Gradient Descent with Heavy Tails.

Learning Non-Vacuous Generalization Bounds from Optimization

Generalization Bounds for Gradient Methods via Discrete and Continuous Prior

Sharper Guarantees for Learning Neural Network Classifiers with Gradient Methods

On Generalization Error Bounds of Noisy Gradient Methods for Non-Convex Learning

Generalization Bounds of SGLD for Non-convex Learning: Two Theoretical Viewpoints.

Penalizing Gradient Norm for Efficiently Improving Generalization in Deep Learning.

Penalizing Gradient Norm for Efficiently Improving Generalization in Deep Learning

Exact, Tractable Gauss-Newton Optimization in Deep Reversible Architectures Reveal Poor Generalization

Generalization Error Bounds for Deep Neural Networks Trained by SGD

An Optimal Transport Analysis on Generalization in Deep Learning

Dropout Training, Data-dependent Regularization, and Generalization Bounds.

Generalization by design: Shortcuts to Generalization in Deep Learning

The Dimension Strikes Back with Gradients: Generalization of Gradient Methods in Stochastic Convex Optimization

The Implicit Regularization for Adaptive Optimization Algorithms on Homogeneous Neural Networks

Train simultaneously, generalize better: Stability of gradient-based minimax learners

Fine-grained Generalization Analysis of Vector-valued Learning

Algorithm-Dependent Generalization Bounds for Overparameterized Deep Residual Networks

Towards Optimal Problem Dependent Generalization Error Bounds in Statistical Learning Theory