Abstract:The design of Envelope and Pilot-Induced Oscillation (PIO) Protection Features, and Failure Cases detection and prevention using Active Control Sidestick (ACS) is a challenging task. While helping the pilot to respect the envelope limitations also in failure scenarios and, therefore, increasing mission effectiveness, these features may have a significant impact on the aircraft's agility. ACS characteristics are investigated in an integrated environment. A set of effective and flexible control laws based on Incremental Nonlinear Dynamic Inversion have been developed in a state-of-the-art aircraft simulation model and coupled with a two-ways communication with the selected ACS. The model can run in real-time in a fixed-based simulator composed of representative cockpit and out-of-the-window.

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

### Problems Addressed by the Paper This paper aims to address key issues in the design of Active Control Sidestick (ACS), Flight Envelope Protection (FEP), Pilot-Induced Oscillation (PIO) protection, and fault detection and prevention in high-performance quantum aircraft. Specifically: 1. **Flight Envelope Protection**: In high-performance quantum aircraft, pilots may find it challenging to effectively monitor the boundaries of the Flight Envelope (FE), especially under rapidly changing flight conditions. This can lead to increased risks and underutilization of available flight performance. The flight envelope protection function can monitor these limits, reduce pilot workload, and improve mission success rates. 2. **Pilot-Induced Oscillation Protection**: During operation, pilots may induce oscillations, a phenomenon known as PIO. The PIO protection mechanism can detect and prevent this from occurring, thereby enhancing flight safety and stability. 3. **Fault Detection and Prevention**: The ACS system may experience faults that need to be detected promptly and appropriate reconfiguration measures taken to ensure normal system operation. 4. **System Integration**: Effectively integrating the above functions into a comprehensive environment for testing and validation in actual flight is a significant challenge. ### Research Motivation and Problem Statement To address these challenges, the researchers propose several key research questions: - What kind of comprehensive infrastructure is needed to develop and test FEP and PIO prevention algorithms? - Which existing FEP and PIO prevention algorithms are most effective? - What are the advantages and disadvantages of ACS? - What fault scenarios might occur in ACS, and how can these faults be mitigated? ### Solutions The paper addresses these issues through the following main aspects: 1. **Understanding ACS Characteristics**: Study the functions and mathematical models of ACS to understand its performance in different tasks. 2. **Integrating FEP and PIO Protection Algorithms**: Develop and implement effective FEP and PIO protection algorithms and integrate them with the ACS system. 3. **Demonstration and Validation**: Establish a comprehensive simulation environment, including aircraft models, flight control laws, ACS, visual systems, and cockpits, for preliminary testing and validation. ### Main Contributions - **Comprehensive Framework**: Established a comprehensive simulation framework for developing and testing FEP and PIO protection algorithms. - **Preliminary Test Results**: Presented preliminary test results validating the effectiveness of the proposed protection algorithms. - **System Integration**: Achieved seamless integration of aircraft models, flight control laws, ACS, visual systems, and cockpits, laying the foundation for further research and applications. Through these efforts, the study aims to enhance the safety and performance of high-performance quantum aircraft, making them easier to control and safer to operate.

Active Sidestick Control Integration for Enhanced Aircraft Flight Envelope Protection

Adaptive Constrained Attitude Control of Spacecraft with Compatible and Guaranteed Performance

Attitude Protection Control for Side Stick-Operated Aircraft

Loss of Control Prevention of an Agile Aircraft: Dynamic Command Saturation Approach

Full-Altitude Attitude Angles Envelope and Model Predictive Control-Based Attitude Angles Protection for Civil Aircraft

Integrated flight control system development using CEASIOM

Probabilistic Flight Envelope Estimation with Application to Unstable Overactuated Aircraft

Re-entry vehicle autopilot design using dynamic inversion with L1 adaptive control augmentation

Innovative Gain Reconfiguration for Active Fault-Tolerant Flight Control: Balance of Stability and Agility

Design of Thrust Vectoring Vertical/Short Takeoff and Landing Aircraft Stability Augmentation Controller Based on L1 Adaptive Control Law

Attitude protection control for stick-oprrated aircraft

Safety Control Design with Flight Envelope Protection and Reference Command Generation.

Adaptive active inceptor design under shared control architecture for nonlinear pilot-induced oscillations

Aeroservoelastic model based active control for large civil aircraft

Adaptive Neural Networks-Based Dynamic Inversion Applied to Reconfigurable Flight Control and Envelope Protection Under Icing Conditions

Unified Control of Flight Dynamics and Actuators Using Local Accelerations

Adaptive PI Control Based Stability Margin Configuration of Aircraft Control Systems with Unknown System Parameters and Time Delay

Multi-constraints Adaptive Finite-Time Integrated Guidance and Control Design

Observer-based Dynamic Surface Control for High-Performance Aircraft Subjected to Unsteady Aerodynamics and Actuator Saturation.

Adaptive Fault-Tolerant Control with Control Allocation for Flight Systems with Severe Actuator Failures and Input Saturation.

A flow-field integrated flight control: dynamic wind tunnel testing and simulation