Abstract:We propose a market designed using game theory to optimally utilize the flexibility of distributed energy resources (DERs) like solar, batteries, electric vehicles, and flexible loads. Market agents perform multiperiod optimization to determine their feasible flexibility limits for power injections while satisfying all constraints of their DERs. This is followed by a Stackelberg game between the market operator and agents. The market operator as the leader aims to regulate the aggregate power injection around a desired value by leveraging the flexibility of their agents, and computes optimal prices for both electricity and flexibility services. The agents follow by optimally bidding their desired flexible power injections in response to these prices. We show the existence and uniqueness of a Nash equilibrium among all the agents and a Stackelberg equilibrium between all agents and the operator. In addition to deriving analytical closed-form solutions, we provide simulation results for a small example system to illustrate our approach.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The problem this paper attempts to address is how to optimally utilize the flexibility of Distributed Energy Resources (DERs) by designing a market mechanism based on game theory. Specifically, the paper proposes a market structure where multi-stage optimization and Stackelberg games are conducted between Market Operators (MOs) and Consumer Market Agents (CMAs) to achieve the following objectives:
1. **Maximize Flexibility**: Ensure the market can fully utilize the flexibility of DERs by optimizing the power injection range of each DER.
2. **Price Mechanism Design**: Set prices for electricity and flexibility services by the market operator to incentivize CMAs to provide the required flexibility.
3. **Equilibrium Analysis**: Demonstrate the existence of a unique Nash Equilibrium and Stackelberg Equilibrium in the proposed market structure to ensure market stability and effectiveness.
### Background and Motivation
To achieve climate change mitigation goals, rapid decarbonization of the grid is necessary, and clean electricity is also key to the electrification and decarbonization of other sectors such as heating, transportation, and heavy industry. This will lead to a shift from fossil fuels to clean energy resources such as battery storage, electric vehicles, and rooftop solar PV systems. Smart inverters will enhance the controllability of Inverter-Based Resources (IBRs), while smart meters and loads (such as heating, ventilation, and air conditioning systems) will also provide more load flexibility.
### Methodology
The paper proposes a consumer-level market structure (CM) that includes Consumer Market Operators (CMOs) and Consumer Market Agents (CMAs). Each CMA represents a household or building, while the CMO is responsible for overseeing and aggregating the resources of all CMAs. Each CMA operates various types of DERs, which provide flexibility in power injection. The specific steps are as follows:
1. **Multi-Stage Optimization**: Each CMA determines the feasible flexibility range of its DERs through multi-stage optimization.
2. **Stackelberg Game**: The market operator, as the leader, regulates the total power injection by setting prices, while CMAs, as followers, optimally bid their desired flexible power injection based on the prices.
3. **Equilibrium Analysis**: Demonstrate the existence of a unique Nash Equilibrium among all CMAs and a unique Stackelberg Equilibrium between all CMAs and the market operator.
### Results
The paper demonstrates the effectiveness of the proposed method through simulation results of a small-scale system. The simulation results show that the market operator can incentivize CMAs to provide the required flexibility by adjusting prices, thereby optimizing the total power injection.
### Future Work
Future work will include simulations on larger-scale systems, relaxing some assumptions about common knowledge and information availability, and exploring numerical methods to compute approximate equilibrium solutions.
### References
The paper cites multiple references in related fields, including game theory, mechanism design, and optimization methods, and provides a detailed list of references.