Abstract:The current investigation focuses on detailed analysis of the anchor-based optimization approach (ABOA), its comparison with alternative global fitting protocols and on the global analysis of the truncation of basis effects in the calculation of binding energies. It is shown that ABOA provides a solution which is close to that obtained in alternative approaches but at small portion of their computational time. The application of a softer correction function after few initial iterations of ABOA stabilizes and speeds up its convergence. The numerical errors in the calculation of binding energies related to the truncation of bosonic and fermionic bases have been globally investigated with respect of asymptotic values corresponding to the infinite basis in the framework of covariant density functional theory (CDFT). These errors typically grow with the increase of the mass and deformation of the nuclei. To reduce such errors in bosonic sector below 10 keV for almost all nuclei with proton number Z<120 one should truncate the bosonic basis at NB=28 instead of presently used NB=20 . The reduction of the errors in binding energies due to the truncation of the fermionic basis in CDFT is significantly more numerically costly. For the first time it is shown that the pattern and the speed of the convergence of binding energies as a function of the size of fermionic basis given by NF depend on the type of covariant energy density functional. The use of explicit density dependence of the meson-nucleon coupling constants or point couplings slows substantially the speed of convergence of binding energies as a function of NF . The present paper clearly indicates the need for accounting of infinite basis corrections for accurate calculation of binding energies and for fitting more precise next-generation covariant energy density functionals: note that such corrections are neglected in the present generation of the functionals. A procedure for finding the asymptotic values of binding energies is suggested in the present paper: it allows better control of numerical errors. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.109.024321 ©2024 American Physical Society

Relativistic Corrections to the CBF Effective Nuclear Hamiltonian

Relativistic corrections to the correlated basis function effective nuclear Hamiltonian

Relativistic constraints on 3N contact interactions

Relativistic effects in ab-initio electron-nucleus scattering

Towards an ab initio covariant density functional theory for nuclear structure

The non-relativistic expansion of Dirac-Coulomb energy and the non-retarded Breit interaction correction up to $α^8$order

Relativistic Brueckner-Hartree-Fock Theory for Finite Nuclei

Towards an ab initio covariant density functional for nuclear structure

Electromagnetic Form Factors of the Nucleon in an Improved Quark Model

A Consistent Description of the Relativistic Effects and Three-Body Interactions in Atomic Nuclei

Relativistic Brueckner-Hartree-Fock Theory: an Ab Initio Approach for Nuclear Matter and for Finite Nuclei

Treating Coulomb Exchange Contributions in Relativistic Mean Field Calculations: Why and How

Fully Self-Consistent Relativistic Brueckner-Hartree-Fock Theory for Finite Nuclei

Toward accurate nuclear mass tables in covariant density functional theory

Reconciling light nuclei and nuclear matter: relativistic $ab\ initio$ calculations

Relativistic Hartree-Fock Chiral Lagrangians with confinement, nucleon finite size and short-range effects

Effects of center-of-mass correction and nucleon anomalous magnetic moments on nuclear charge radii

Perturbation Calculations of Nucleon–nucleon Effective Interactions in the Hartree–Fock Basis

Finite-nuclear-size effect in hydrogen-like ions with relativistic nuclear structure

Optimizing the relativistic energy density functional with nuclear ground state and collective excitation properties