Tobias Alt,Andrea Ibisch,Clemens Meiser,Anna Wilhelm,Raphael Zimmer,Christian Berghoff,Christoph Droste,Jens Karschau,Friederike Laus,Rainer Plaga,Carola Plesch,Britta Sennewald,Thomas Thaeren,Kristina Unverricht,Steffen Waurick
Abstract:Generative AI models are capable of performing a wide range of tasks that traditionally require creativity and human understanding. They learn patterns from existing data during training and can subsequently generate new content such as texts, images, and music that follow these patterns. Due to their versatility and generally high-quality results, they, on the one hand, represent an opportunity for digitalization. On the other hand, the use of generative AI models introduces novel IT security risks that need to be considered for a comprehensive analysis of the threat landscape in relation to IT security. In response to this risk potential, companies or authorities using them should conduct an individual risk analysis before integrating generative AI into their workflows. The same applies to developers and operators, as many risks in the context of generative AI have to be taken into account at the time of development or can only be influenced by the operating company. Based on this, existing security measures can be adjusted, and additional measures can be taken.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The problems that this paper attempts to solve mainly focus on the opportunities and risks of generative AI models, especially large - language models (LLMs), in the applications of industrial and government institutions. Specifically:
1. **Technical potential and application**: It explores the potential applications of generative AI models, especially LLMs, in various fields such as computer science, history, law, medicine, etc., and emphasizes their capabilities in text generation, editing, processing, and programming support.
2. **Opportunities in the IT security field**: It discusses the potential value of LLMs in improving existing IT security practices, analyzing and strengthening program codes, creating secure codes, analyzing data traffic, etc.
3. **Risk assessment**: It analyzes in detail the risks that may be brought by using LLMs, which are divided into three categories:
- **Risks in proper use**: These include, but are not limited to, unexpected output, memory effect, bias, lack of quality assurance, factual errors, obsolete information, lack of reproducibility and interpretability, security issues of generated codes, improper responses to specific inputs, automation bias, misreading text as instructions, confidentiality issues of input data, self - reinforcement effect and model collapse, dependence on model developers/operators, etc.
- **Abuse risks**: These cover illegal activities such as using LLMs to generate misleading information, conducting social engineering attacks, re - identifying anonymous data, collecting and processing knowledge related to network attacks, generating and improving malware, etc.
- **Attack risks**: These involve attacks against LLMs themselves, such as data poisoning, model reverse - engineering, adversarial attacks, etc., which aim to disrupt the functions of the models or steal training data.
4. **Risk management recommendations**: In response to the above - mentioned risks, corresponding countermeasures are proposed, including but not limited to strengthening data privacy protection, implementing strict access control, regularly updating models to reduce the impact of obsolete information, enhancing the transparency and interpretability of models, establishing effective monitoring mechanisms, etc.
Through these analyses, the paper aims to provide a comprehensive risk management framework for companies and government institutions, so that they can effectively respond to and mitigate relevant security threats while enjoying the convenience brought by generative AI technology.