Tox-BART: Leveraging Toxicity Attributes for Explanation Generation of Implicit Hate Speech

Neemesh Yadav,Sarah Masud,Vikram Goyal,Vikram Goyal,Md Shad Akhtar,Tanmoy Chakraborty
2024-06-06
Abstract:Employing language models to generate explanations for an incoming implicit hate post is an active area of research. The explanation is intended to make explicit the underlying stereotype and aid content moderators. The training often combines top-k relevant knowledge graph (KG) tuples to provide world knowledge and improve performance on standard metrics. Interestingly, our study presents conflicting evidence for the role of the quality of KG tuples in generating implicit explanations. Consequently, simpler models incorporating external toxicity signals outperform KG-infused models. Compared to the KG-based setup, we observe a comparable performance for SBIC (LatentHatred) datasets with a performance variation of +0.44 (+0.49), +1.83 (-1.56), and -4.59 (+0.77) in BLEU, ROUGE-L, and BERTScore. Further human evaluation and error analysis reveal that our proposed setup produces more precise explanations than zero-shot GPT-3.5, highlighting the intricate nature of the task.
Computation and Language
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
### Problems the Paper Attempts to Solve The paper "Tox-BART: Generating Explanations for Implicit Hate Speech Using Toxicity Attributes" aims to address the problem of automatically generating explanations for implicit hate speech. Specifically, the paper focuses on how to use language models to generate clear explanations for implicit hate speech to reveal the underlying stereotypes and implicit malice. These explanations help content moderators better understand and handle implicit hate speech. ### Main Research Background 1. **Characteristics of Implicit Hate Speech**: - Implicit hate speech uses indirect expressions and stereotypes to mask its malice, making it difficult for existing content moderation systems (whether human or computer-assisted) to identify and understand. - Even advanced systems like ChatGPT find it challenging to effectively identify implicit hate speech without clear explanations. 2. **Limitations of Existing Methods**: - Existing methods typically combine world knowledge from Knowledge Graphs (KG) to improve the performance of explanation generation. - However, these methods are limited in generating explanations for implicit hate speech because the quality and relevance of the knowledge graphs do not significantly impact the task. ### Main Contributions of the Paper 1. **Proposing the Tox-BART Model**: - Tox-BART is a BART-based language model that generates explanations for implicit hate speech by introducing "toxicity attributes." - "Toxicity attributes" include signals from both within and outside the dataset, such as target groups, types of insults, and levels of hate intensity. 2. **Experimental Results**: - Compared to knowledge graph-based methods, Tox-BART performs comparably or better across multiple datasets. - Human evaluations and error analysis show that Tox-BART's generated explanations are more accurate than zero-shot GPT-3.5. 3. **Theoretical and Practical Significance**: - The study confirms the effectiveness of introducing "toxicity attributes" in generating explanations for implicit hate speech. - These findings have profound implications for the application of knowledge graphs in subjective tasks, suggesting that in some cases, simple external signals may be more useful than complex knowledge graphs. ### Conclusion Overall, this paper improves the generation of explanations for implicit hate speech by introducing "toxicity attributes," providing new tools and methods for content moderation. These methods are not only technically effective but also help improve the accuracy and efficiency of content moderation in practical applications.