Abstract:Reaction networks (RNs) comprise a set X of species and a set of reactions , each converting a multiset of educts into a multiset of products. RNs are equivalent to directed hypergraphs. However, not all RNs necessarily admit a chemical interpretation. Instead, they might contradict fundamental principles of physics such as the conservation of energy and mass or the reversibility of chemical reactions. The consequences of these necessary conditions for the stoichiometric matrix have been discussed extensively in the chemical literature. Here, we provide sufficient conditions for that guarantee the interpretation of RNs in terms of balanced sum formulas and structural formulas, respectively. Chemically plausible RNs allow neither a perpetuum mobile, i.e., a "futile cycle" of reactions with non-vanishing energy production, nor the creation or annihilation of mass. Such RNs are said to be thermodynamically sound and conservative. For finite RNs, both conditions can be expressed equivalently as properties of the stoichiometric matrix . The first condition is vacuous for reversible networks, but it excludes irreversible futile cycles and—in a stricter sense—futile cycles that even contain an irreversible reaction. The second condition is equivalent to the existence of a strictly positive reaction invariant. It is also sufficient for the existence of a realization in terms of sum formulas, obeying conservation of "atoms". In particular, these realizations can be chosen such that any two species have distinct sum formulas, unless implies that they are "obligatory isomers". In terms of structural formulas, every compound is a labeled multigraph, in essence a Lewis formula, and reactions comprise only a rearrangement of bonds such that the total bond order is preserved. In particular, for every conservative RN, there exists a Lewis realization, in which any two compounds are realized by pairwisely distinct multigraphs. Finally, we show that, in general, there are infinitely many realizations for a given conservative RN. "Chemical" RNs are directed hypergraphs with a stoichiometric matrix whose left kernel contains a strictly positive vector and whose right kernel does not contain a futile cycle involving an irreversible reaction. This simple characterization also provides a concise specification of random models for chemical RNs that additionally constrain by rank, sparsity, or distribution of the non-zero entries. Furthermore, it suggests several interesting avenues for future research, in particular, concerning alternative representations of reaction networks and infinite chemical universes.

Recurrent neural chemical reaction networks that approximate arbitrary dynamics

Genetic Algorithm Based Recurrent Fuzzy Neural Network Modeling of Chemical Processes

NeuralCRNs: A Natural Implementation of Learning in Chemical Reaction Networks

Programming and training rate-independent chemical reaction networks

Autonomous Discovery of Unknown Reaction Pathways from Data by Chemical Reaction Neural Network

Noise-robust chemical reaction networks training artificial neural networks

Recurrent Neural Network Integrated with Process-Priori-knowledge and Its Application

Differentiable Programming of Chemical Reaction Networks

Automated deep abstractions for stochastic chemical reaction networks

Towards Programming Adaptive Linear Neural Networks Through Chemical Reaction Networks

Autonomous Learning of Generative Models with Chemical Reaction Network Ensembles

Optimality-preserving Reduction of Chemical Reaction Networks

Programming molecular systems to emulate a learning spiking neuron

CRNs Exposed: Systematic Exploration of Chemical Reaction Networks

Chemical reaction networks and opportunities for machine learning

Universal slow dynamics of chemical reaction networks

What makes a reaction network "chemical"?

Engineering reaction-diffusion networks with properties of neural tissue

Independent Decompositions of Chemical Reaction Networks

Reverse Engineering Chemical Reaction Networks from Time Series Data