The Oxford Olympics Study 2024: Are Cost and Cost Overrun at the Games Coming Down?

Alexander Budzier,Bent Flyvbjerg
2024-07-31
Abstract:The present paper is an update of the "Oxford Olympics Study 2016" (Flyvbjerg et al. 2016). We document that the Games remain costly and continue to have large cost overruns, to a degree that threatens their viability. The IOC is aware of the problem and has initiated reform. We assess the reforms and find: (a) Olympic costs are statistically significantly increasing; prior analysis did not show this trend; it is a step in the wrong direction. (b) Cost overruns were decreasing until 2008, but have increased since then; again a step in the wrong direction. (c) At present, the cost of Paris 2024 is USD 8.7 billion (2022 level) and cost overruns is 115% in real terms; this is not the cheap Games that were promised. (d) Cost overruns are the norm for the Games, past, present, and future; they are the only project type that never delivered on budget. We assess a new IOC policy of reducing cost by reusing existing venues instead of building new ones. We find that reuse did not have the desired effect for Tokyo 2020 and also look ineffective for Paris 2024. Finally, we recommend that the Games look to other types of megaprojects for better data, better forecasting, and how to generate the positive learning curves that are necessary for bringing costs and overrun down. Only if this happens are Los Angeles 2028 and Brisbane 2032 likely to live up to the IOC's intentions of a more affordable Games that more cities will want to host.
Risk Management,General Economics
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The paper primarily explores the issues of costs and cost overruns associated with the Olympic Games and evaluates the reform measures taken by the International Olympic Committee (IOC) to address these issues. Specifically, the paper addresses the following key questions: 1. **Severity of the Cost Issue**: - The paper points out that the costs of the Olympic Games are extremely high, with significant cost overruns that threaten the sustainability of the Games. - For example, the actual costs of recent Summer Olympics have greatly exceeded their budgets, such as the cost of Paris 2024, which has soared from the initial estimate of €3.6 billion to €8.8 billion. 2. **Cost Trend Analysis**: - Through data analysis, the paper shows that the costs of the Olympic Games are on a significant upward trend. Both the Summer and Winter Olympics have seen a noticeable increase in their average costs. - The growth in costs is evident not only in the overall expenses but also in the unit costs per athlete and event for each edition of the Games. 3. **Cost Overrun Situations**: - The paper provides a detailed record of cost overruns for the Olympic Games from 1960 to 2024, finding that all Games have experienced varying degrees of cost overruns. - On average, the cost overruns for the Summer and Winter Olympics have reached 195% and 132%, respectively, indicating a substantial financial risk in hosting the Games. 4. **IOC's Reform Measures and Their Effectiveness**: - The IOC has recognized the cost issues and initiated a series of reform measures, including reducing the need for new venues and reusing existing facilities. - However, the paper's evaluation suggests that these reform measures have not achieved the desired effects, as evidenced by the significant cost increases for the Tokyo 2020 and Paris 2024 Olympics. - The paper recommends leveraging data from other large projects, forecasting methods, and learning curves to effectively control costs. 5. **Comparison with Other Capital Projects**: - The paper also compares the cost overruns of the Olympic Games with other types of large projects, such as nuclear energy storage and nuclear power plant construction. The results show that the cost overruns of the Olympic Games are second only to those of nuclear energy storage projects. In summary, the paper aims to reveal the severity and complexity of the cost issues associated with the Olympic Games and to evaluate the IOC's reform measures. The ultimate goal is to promote a more sustainable and economically viable model for organizing the Olympic Games.