Back-Propagating Rupture: Nature, Excitation, and Implications

Xiaotian Ding,Shiqing Xu,Eiichi Fukuyama,Futoshi Yamashita

2024-06-03

Abstract:Recent observations show that certain rupture phase can propagate backward relative to the earlier one during a single earthquake event. Such back-propagating rupture (BPR) was not well considered by the conventional earthquake source studies and remains a mystery to the seismological community. Here we present a comprehensive analysis of BPR, by combining theoretical considerations, numerical simulations, and observational evidences. First, we argue that BPR in terms of back-propagating stress wave is an intrinsic feature during dynamic ruptures; however, its signature can be easily masked by the destructive interference behind the primary rupture front. Then, we propose an idea that perturbation to an otherwise smooth rupture process may make some phases of BPR observable. We test and verify this idea by numerically simulating rupture propagation under a variety of perturbations, including a sudden change of stress, bulk or interfacial property and fault geometry along rupture propagation path. We further cross-validate the numerical results by available observations from laboratory and natural earthquakes, and confirm that rupture "reflection" at free surface, rupture coalescence and breakage of prominent asperity are very efficient for exciting observable BPR. Based on the simulated and observed results, we classify BPR into two general types: interface wave and high-order re-rupture, depending on the stress recovery and drop before and after the arrival of BPR, respectively. Our work clarifies the nature and excitation of BPR, and can help improve the understanding of earthquake physics, the inference of fault property distribution and evolution, and the assessment of earthquake hazard.

Geophysics,Soft Condensed Matter

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The paper primarily explores a special phenomenon during earthquakes—Back-Propagating Rupture (BPR), which refers to the scenario where, in a single seismic event, some rupture stages can propagate backward relative to earlier stages. This phenomenon differs from the traditional seismological theory where ruptures always propagate forward, thus attracting significant attention from the seismological community.

The paper first points out through theoretical analysis that back-propagating stress waves, as an intrinsic characteristic, almost always exist during dynamic rupture processes. However, their features might be obscured by the mutual cancellation effects of waves behind the main rupture front. The authors then propose a viewpoint that disturbing the originally smooth rupture process can make BPR observable at certain stages. To verify this hypothesis, researchers conducted numerical simulations considering various types of disturbances, including sudden changes in stress, bulk properties, or interface properties, as well as changes in fault geometry. They also cross-validated the simulation results with laboratory experiments and natural earthquake observations.

Based on the simulation and observation results, the authors categorize BPR into two types: interface waves and higher-order re-ruptures. Interface waves refer to situations where the change in the shear stress baseline is negligible when BPR arrives; higher-order re-ruptures refer to cases with significant shear stress offsets. These findings help deepen our understanding of the physical processes of earthquakes, improve our knowledge of fault property distribution and its evolution, and enhance earthquake risk assessment capabilities.

In summary, the main aim of this paper is to clarify the nature of BPR and its triggering mechanisms, providing new insights for research in seismology and other related fields.