Impact of Generative AI (Large Language Models) on the PRA model construction and maintenance, observations

Valentin Rychkov,Claudia Picoco,Emilie Caleca
2024-06-14
Abstract:The rapid development of Large Language Models (LLMs) and Generative Pre-Trained Transformers(GPTs) in the field of Generative Artificial Intelligence (AI) can significantly impact task automation in themodern economy. We anticipate that the PRA field will inevitably be affected by this technology. Thus, themain goal of this paper is to engage the risk assessment community into a discussion of benefits anddrawbacks of this technology for PRA. We make a preliminary analysis of possible application of LLM inProbabilistic Risk Assessment (PRA) modeling context referring to the ongoing experience in softwareengineering field. We explore potential application scenarios and the necessary conditions for controlledLLM usage in PRA modeling (whether static or dynamic). Additionally, we consider the potential impact ofthis technology on PRA modeling tools.
Performance
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The problem that this paper attempts to solve is to explore the impact of generative artificial intelligence (especially large language models, LLM, and Generative Pretrained Transformer, GPT) on probabilistic risk assessment (PRA) modeling and maintenance. Specifically, the paper focuses on the following points: 1. **Technical Impact and Application**: Analyze the potential application scenarios of generative AI in PRA modeling, including static (Boolean - logic - based event trees and fault trees) and dynamic reliability modeling. For example, generative AI can be used to automatically generate fault trees, interpret existing models, and review model consistency, etc. 2. **Verification and Quality Control**: Emphasize that when using generative AI in PRA modeling, automatic verification methods and tools must be developed to ensure the correctness and reliability of the generated content. This includes grammar and semantic verification, and these verification methods are more important especially in dynamic models. 3. **Tools and Formats**: Discuss two options that PRA software developers may face: adopting an open exchange format to share the cost of generative AI solutions, or retaining a proprietary format and customizing existing AI solutions. 4. **Challenges and Future Directions**: Identify and discuss the challenges faced in introducing generative AI in the PRA field, such as issues in data security, economic benefits, organizational adjustment, regulatory policies, and knowledge management. Through these discussions, the paper aims to prompt the risk assessment community to think about how to utilize the advantages of generative AI while dealing with possible technological and social challenges. The following is a summary of the core questions in the paper: - **How can generative AI be applied to different stages of PRA modeling?** - **When using generative AI in PRA modeling, how can the correctness and reliability of the generated content be ensured?** - **How should PRA software developers respond to the tool and format changes brought about by generative AI?** - **What are the main challenges faced by the PRA field when introducing generative AI?** The answers to these questions are of great significance for promoting technological innovation and practical improvement in the PRA field.