Synchronizing Rhythms of Logic

John M. Myers,Hadi Madjid
2024-09-06
Abstract:Although quantum states nicely explain experiments, the outcomes of experiments are not states. Instead, outcomes correspond to probability distributions. Twenty years ago we proved categorically that probability distributions leave open a choice of quantum states to explain experiments that is resolvable only by a move beyond logic, which, inspired or not, can be characterized as a guess. Guesses link the inner lives of investigators to their explanations of experimental results. Recognizing the inescapability of guesswork in physics leads to avenues of investigation, one of which is presented here. We invert the quest for the logical foundations of physics to reveal a physical basis for logic and calculation, and we represent this basis mathematically, in such a way as to show the shaping and re-shaping of calculations by guesswork. We draw on the interplay between guessing and computation in digital contexts that, perhaps surprisingly, include living organisms. Digital computation and communication depend on a type of synchronization that coordinates transitions among physically distinct conditions represented by "digits." This logical synchronization, known to engineers but neglected in physics, requires guesswork for its maintenance. By abstracting digital hardware, we model the structure of human thinking as logically synchronized computation, punctuated by guesses. We adapt marked graphs to mathematically represent computation and represent guesses by unpredictable changes in these marked graphs. The marked graphs reveal a logical substructure to spatial and temporal navigation, with implications across physics and its biological applications. By limiting our model to the logical aspect of communications and computations we unveil logical structure in relation to guesswork, applicable not just to electronics but also to the functioning of living organisms.
General Physics
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The paper attempts to address the following key issues: 1. **The Role of Logical Synchronization and Guessing in Physics**: The paper demonstrates the inevitable component of guessing in the interpretation of quantum experiments and explores how this guessing affects the interpretation of physical experiment results. The author argues that physicists need to make guesses when interpreting experimental results, and these guesses cannot be derived through logical deduction. 2. **The Basis of Logical Synchronization and Its Importance to Computational Networks**: The paper discusses the concept of logical synchronization in digital communication and computation (different from synchronization in the narrow sense of relativity) and explains its importance for maintaining the normal operation of computational networks. Logical synchronization relies on the adjustment of clock rates, and this adjustment requires guessing to be completed. 3. **Marked Graphs as a Mathematical Representation Tool**: To better describe the communication and computation processes in computational networks, the paper introduces marked graphs as a mathematical tool. Marked graphs can be used to represent various state changes in computational networks and reveal the concept of logical distance, which helps in understanding the role of logical synchronization in the computation process. 4. **Biological Applications**: The paper further applies the above theories to the field of biology, exploring how computational networks within biological organisms process information through logical synchronization. For example, the human thinking process can be modeled as a computational process with unpredictable reprogramming. In summary, the core of the paper lies in exploring logical synchronization, guessing, and their applications in physics, biology, and mathematics, and proposes a new framework based on marked graphs to explain these phenomena.