Should we necessarily treat masses as localized when analysing tests of quantum gravity?

Adrian Kent

2024-05-31

Abstract:Recently proposed ``table-top tests of quantum gravity'' involve creating, separating and recombining superpositions of masses at non-relativistic speeds. The general expectation is that these generate superpositions of gravitational fields via the Newtonian potential. Analyses suggest that negligible gravitational radiation is generated if the interference experiments involve sufficiently small accelerations. One way of thinking about this is that matter and the static gravitational field are temporarily entangled and then disentangled. Another is that the static gravitational field degrees of freedom are dependent on the matter and do not belong to a separate Hilbert space, and that there is always negligible entanglement between matter and dynamical gravitational degrees of freedom. In this last picture, localized masses effectively become infinitely extended objects, inseparable from their Newtonian potentials. While this picture seems hard to extend to a fully relativistic theory of non-quantum gravity, it has significant implications for analyses of how or whether BMV and other non-relativistic experiments might test the quantum nature of gravity. If the masses in a BMV experiment are regarded as occupying overlapping regions (or indeed all of space), explaining how they become entangled does not require that their gravitational interaction involves quantum information exchange. On this view, while the experiments test gravity in a regime where quantum theory describes all relevant matter degrees of freedom, they do not necessarily test its quantum nature. It might be argued that no plausible explanation other than quantum gravity could be consistent both with these experiments and with relativity. But this relies on further theoretical assumptions and is weaker than claiming direct evidence for quantum gravitational interactions from the experiments alone.

General Relativity and Quantum Cosmology,Quantum Physics

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

This paper attempts to explore whether mass must be regarded as localized when analyzing tests of quantum gravity. Specifically, the paper discusses the recently proposed "table - top tests of quantum gravity", which involve creating, separating, and recombining superposition states of mass at non - relativistic speeds. The general expectation is that these processes generate superposition states of the gravitational field through the Newtonian potential. However, the author presents a view that in this case, matter and the static gravitational field can be considered to be temporarily entangled and then disentangled, or the degrees of freedom of the static gravitational field depend on matter and do not belong to an independent Hilbert space, so the entanglement between matter and the dynamic gravitational degrees of freedom can always be ignored. This view implies that if the masses in the experiment are regarded as occupying overlapping regions (or the entire space), then explaining how they are entangled does not require the assumption that their gravitational interactions involve quantum information exchange.

The paper further explores the impact of this view on how or whether the quantum nature of gravity can be tested through BMV (Bose - Mari - Vedral) and other non - relativistic experiments. The author points out that although these experiments test gravity under the condition that a quantum theory is required to describe all relevant matter degrees of freedom, they do not necessarily directly test the quantum nature of gravity. The paper emphasizes that any argument claiming that these experiments provide direct evidence of quantum - gravitational interactions depends on further theoretical assumptions, and thus these arguments are less powerful than the conclusions drawn directly from the experiments themselves.

In summary, the core question of this paper is to question and explore whether non - relativistic tests of quantum gravity (such as the BMV experiment) can provide direct evidence about the quantum nature of gravity, especially when considering that mass may not be localized.