On equivalence of two formulas of orbital magnetic susceptibility for tight-binding models

Tomonari Mizoguchi,Nobuyuki Okuma

DOI: https://doi.org/10.7566/JPSJ.93.095002

2024-08-02

Abstract:We prove that two formulas of the orbital magnetic susceptibility, namely, Koshino-Ando's formula and Gómez-Santos and Stauber's formula, are equivalent for the tight-binding models. The difference between these two formulas can be written in a form containing the surface terms arising from the momentum-space integration, and we show that the surface terms are exactly vanishing although the primitive functions are seemingly non-periodic with respect to the translation by the reciprocal lattice vector.

Mesoscale and Nanoscale Physics,Materials Science

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

### What problem does this paper attempt to solve?

This paper aims to prove that two formulas used to describe the orbital magnetic susceptibility in the tight - binding model are equivalent. Specifically, the author tries to prove that the Koshino - Ando formula and the Gómez - Santos and Stauber formula are equivalent when dealing with orbital magnetic susceptibility.

#### Background and Motivation

Orbital magnetic susceptibility is a fundamental physical quantity that describes the response of non - magnetic materials under an applied magnetic field, which originates from the orbital motion of electrons. Even for non - interacting electron systems, the theoretical treatment of magnetic susceptibility remains a challenging problem. Many studies have shown that interband effects play a crucial role in orbital magnetic susceptibility, and these effects can be explained by the concepts of modern topology and quantum geometry.

#### Specific Problems

In this paper, the author focuses on the equivalence problem between two different orbital magnetic susceptibility formulas:

1. **Koshino - Ando formula**:
\[
\chi_{\text{orb}}^{\text{(KA)}} = -\frac{e^2}{4\pi\hbar^2} \int_{-\infty}^{\infty} d\epsilon f(\epsilon) \text{Im}[\Theta^{\text{(KA)}}(\epsilon)]
\]
where
\[
\Theta^{\text{(KA)}}(\epsilon) = \frac{1}{V} \sum_k \text{Tr}\left\{ v_x^k G_k(\epsilon) v_y^k G_k(\epsilon) v_x^k G_k(\epsilon) v_y^k G_k(\epsilon) - 2v_x^k G_k(\epsilon) v_x^k G_k(\epsilon) v_y^k G_k(\epsilon) v_y^k G_k(\epsilon) - \frac{1}{2} \left[ G_k(\epsilon) v_y^k G_k(\epsilon) \frac{\partial v_x^k}{\partial k_x} G_k(\epsilon) v_y^k + G_k(\epsilon) v_x^k G_k(\epsilon) \frac{\partial v_y^k}{\partial k_y} G_k(\epsilon) v_x^k \right] \right\}
\]

2. **Gómez - Santos and Stauber formula**:
\[
\chi_{\text{orb}}^{\text{(GS)}} = -\frac{e^2}{4\pi\hbar^2} \int_{-\infty}^{\infty} d\epsilon f(\epsilon) \text{Im}[\Theta^{\text{(GS)}}(\epsilon)]
\]
where
\[
\Theta^{\text{(GS)}}(\epsilon) = \frac{1}{V} \sum_k \text{Tr}\left[ 2v_x^k G_k(\epsilon) v_y^k G_k(\epsilon) v_x^k G_k(\epsilon) v_y^k G_k(\epsilon) + \left( G_k(\epsilon) v_x^k G_k(\epsilon) v_y^k + G_k(\epsilon) v_y^k G_k(\epsilon) v_x^k \right) \right]