Abstract:In-context learning (ICL) allows LLMs to learn from examples without changing their weights: this is a particularly promising capability for long-context LLMs that can potentially learn from many examples. Recently, Lin et al. (2024) proposed URIAL, a method using only three in-context examples to align base LLMs, achieving non-trivial instruction following performance. In this work, we show that, while effective, ICL alignment with URIAL still underperforms compared to instruction fine-tuning on the established benchmark MT-Bench, especially with more capable base LLMs. We then uncover the most relevant elements for successful in-context alignment, finding the crucial role of the decoding parameters. Based on these insights, we show that the approach of URIAL can indeed be improved by adding high-quality, potentially carefully selected via greedy search, demonstrations in context, getting closer to the performance of instruct models. Finally, we provide the first, to our knowledge, systematic comparison of ICL and instruction fine-tuning (IFT) for instruction following in the low data regime, where ICL can be a viable alternative to IFT. Overall, our work advances the understanding of ICL as an alignment technique and its relationship to IFT. We provide our code at <a class="link-external link-https" href="https://github.com/tml-epfl/icl-alignment" rel="external noopener nofollow">this https URL</a>.

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The problem that this paper attempts to solve is: in instruction - following tasks, whether In - Context Learning (ICL) can be an effective alignment technique. Compared with traditional Instruction Fine - Tuning (IFT), especially in the case of limited data, can ICL be a viable alternative to IFT? Specifically, the paper explores this problem through the following aspects: 1. **Systematic evaluation of URIAL**: The paper first systematically evaluates the URIAL method proposed by Lin et al., which is a technique for context alignment using a small number of high - quality examples. The author compares the performance of different base models with URIAL prompts and instruction - fine - tuned models on the MT - Bench benchmark. The results show that although URIAL can achieve competitive performance in some cases, in most cases, it still lags behind instruction - fine - tuned models, especially performing worse in multi - round conversations. 2. **Key factors affecting context alignment**: The author further analyzes the key factors affecting the context alignment effect, especially the choice of decoding parameters. Experiments show that decoding parameters (such as temperature, sampling schemes, etc.) have a significant impact on the quality of model generation. Appropriate decoding parameter configurations can enable the base model to achieve reasonable performance even without context examples. 3. **Multi - example context learning**: In order to improve the effect of context alignment, the author tests the impact of adding more high - quality examples. The results find that although increasing the number of examples can improve performance to a certain extent, the effect quickly saturates, and increasing the number of examples cannot completely make up for the gap with instruction - fine - tuned models. In addition, the author also proposes a greedy search algorithm to select the most effective context examples, and this method can significantly improve performance when adding a small number of examples. 4. **Comparison between ICL and IFT**: Finally, the paper systematically compares the performance of ICL and IFT in low - data - volume scenarios. Experiments show that with the support of high - quality data, the performance of ICL and IFT in the first round of conversation is almost the same, but in the second round of conversation, IFT is significantly better than ICL. This indicates that ICL has certain limitations in handling multi - round conversations. Overall, through in - depth analysis and experiments on ICL, the paper provides new insights into the effectiveness and limitations of ICL as an alignment technique and provides valuable references for future research.

Is In-Context Learning Sufficient for Instruction Following in LLMs?

LLMs Are In-Context Reinforcement Learners

The Unlocking Spell on Base LLMs: Rethinking Alignment via In-Context Learning

Does In-Context Learning Really Learn? Rethinking How Large Language Models Respond and Solve Tasks via In-Context Learning

How Far Can In-Context Alignment Go? Exploring the State of In-Context Alignment

When Does In-context Learning Fall Short and Why? A Study on Specification-Heavy Tasks

An Empirical Study of In-context Learning in LLMs for Machine Translation

In-Context Learning with Reinforcement Learning for Incomplete Utterance Rewriting

LLMs Are Few-Shot In-Context Low-Resource Language Learners

"In-Context Learning" or: How I learned to stop worrying and love "Applied Information Retrieval"

Exploring the Relationship between In-Context Learning and Instruction Tuning

Decoding In-Context Learning: Neuroscience-inspired Analysis of Representations in Large Language Models

Investigating the Learning Behaviour of In-Context Learning: A Comparison with Supervised Learning

Revisiting In-Context Learning with Long Context Language Models

In-Context Language Learning: Architectures and Algorithms

Let's Learn Step by Step: Enhancing In-Context Learning Ability with Curriculum Learning

What In-Context Learning "Learns" In-Context: Disentangling Task Recognition and Task Learning

A Survey on In-context Learning

Improving In-Context Learning with Small Language Model Ensembles

Unveiling In-Context Learning: A Coordinate System to Understand Its Working Mechanism

Learning vs Retrieval: The Role of In-Context Examples in Regression with LLMs