Abstract:Addressing the challenge of toxic language in online discussions is crucial for the development of effective toxicity detection models. This pioneering work focuses on addressing imbalanced datasets in toxicity detection by introducing a novel approach to augment toxic language data. We create a balanced dataset by instructing fine-tuning of Large Language Models (LLMs) using Reinforcement Learning with Human Feedback (RLHF). Recognizing the challenges in collecting sufficient toxic samples from social media platforms for building a balanced dataset, our methodology involves sentence-level text data augmentation through paraphrasing existing samples using optimized generative LLMs. Leveraging generative LLM, we utilize the Proximal Policy Optimizer (PPO) as the RL algorithm to fine-tune the model further and align it with human feedback. In other words, we start by fine-tuning a LLM using an instruction dataset, specifically tailored for the task of paraphrasing while maintaining semantic consistency. Next, we apply PPO and a reward function, to further fine-tune (optimize) the instruction-tuned LLM. This RL process guides the model in generating toxic responses. We utilize the Google Perspective API as a toxicity evaluator to assess generated responses and assign rewards/penalties accordingly. This approach guides LLMs through PPO and the reward function, transforming minority class samples into augmented versions. The primary goal of our methodology is to create a balanced and diverse dataset to enhance the accuracy and performance of classifiers in identifying instances from the minority class. Utilizing two publicly available toxic datasets, we compared various techniques with our proposed method for generating toxic samples, demonstrating that our approach outperforms all others in producing a higher number of toxic samples. Starting with an initial 16,225 toxic prompts, our method successfully generated 122,951 toxic samples with a toxicity score exceeding 30%. Subsequently, we developed various classifiers using the generated balanced datasets and applied a cost-sensitive learning approach to the original imbalanced dataset. The findings highlight the superior performance of classifiers trained on data generated using our proposed method. These results highlight the importance of employing RL and a data-agnostic model as a reward mechanism for augmenting toxic data, thereby enhancing the robustness of toxicity detection models.

Toxicity Detection for Free

Efficient Detection of Toxic Prompts in Large Language Models

Efficient Toxic Content Detection by Bootstrapping and Distilling Large Language Models

Unveiling the Implicit Toxicity in Large Language Models

You Only Prompt Once: On the Capabilities of Prompt Learning on Large Language Models to Tackle Toxic Content

Can LLMs Recognize Toxicity? A Structured Investigation Framework and Toxicity Metric

Can LLMs Recognize Toxicity? Structured Toxicity Investigation Framework and Semantic-Based Metric

How Toxic Can You Get? Search-based Toxicity Testing for Large Language Models

Realistic Evaluation of Toxicity in Large Language Models

PolygloToxicityPrompts: Multilingual Evaluation of Neural Toxic Degeneration in Large Language Models

Toxicity Detection towards Adaptability to Changing Perturbations

Detecting AI Flaws: Target-Driven Attacks on Internal Faults in Language Models

Challenges in Detoxifying Language Models

Can Open-source LLMs Enhance Data Synthesis for Toxic Detection?: An Experimental Study

AugmenToxic: Leveraging Reinforcement Learning to Optimize LLM Instruction Fine-Tuning for Data Augmentation to Enhance Toxicity Detection

FrenchToxicityPrompts: a Large Benchmark for Evaluating and Mitigating Toxicity in French Texts

Toxicity Detection can be Sensitive to the Conversational Context

ASTPrompter: Weakly Supervised Automated Language Model Red-Teaming to Identify Likely Toxic Prompts

Toxicity Detection is NOT all you Need: Measuring the Gaps to Supporting Volunteer Content Moderators

Automatic Pseudo-Harmful Prompt Generation for Evaluating False Refusals in Large Language Models

OR-Bench: An Over-Refusal Benchmark for Large Language Models