On Creativity and Open-Endedness

L. B. Soros,Alyssa Adams,Stefano Kalonaris,Olaf Witkowski,Christian Guckelsberger
2024-06-24
Abstract:Artificial Life (ALife) as an interdisciplinary field draws inspiration and influence from a variety of perspectives. Scientific progress crucially depends, then, on concerted efforts to invite cross-disciplinary dialogue. The goal of this paper is to revitalize discussions of potential connections between the fields of Computational Creativity (CC) and ALife, focusing specifically on the concept of Open-Endedness (OE); the primary goal of CC is to endow artificial systems with creativity, and ALife has dedicated much research effort into studying and synthesizing OE and artificial innovation. However, despite the close proximity of these concepts, their use so far remains confined to their respective communities, and their relationship is largely unclear. We provide historical context for research in both domains, and review the limited work connecting research on creativity and OE explicitly. We then highlight specific questions to be considered, with the eventual goals of (i) decreasing conceptual ambiguity by highlighting similarities and differences between the concepts of OE and creativity, (ii) identifying synergy effects of a research agenda that encompasses both concepts, and (iii) establishing a dialogue between ALife and CC research.
Artificial Intelligence
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
### Problems the Paper Attempts to Solve This paper aims to explore the potential connections between the fields of Computational Creativity (CC) and Artificial Life (ALife), with a particular focus on the concept of Open-Endedness (OE). Specifically, the goals of the paper include: 1. **Reducing Conceptual Ambiguity**: Clarifying the similarities and differences between the concepts of OE and creativity through comparison and analysis. 2. **Identifying Synergies**: Exploring the potential synergies that a research agenda encompassing both OE and creativity might bring. 3. **Establishing Dialogue**: Promoting interdisciplinary dialogue between the ALife and CC research communities to advance research in both fields. ### Background and Motivation - **Computational Creativity (CC)**: The main goal of CC is to endow computational systems with creativity, enabling them to innovate and create. CC research is typically divided into two main directions: understanding human creativity and producing machine creativity. - **Artificial Life (ALife)**: ALife research studies life and life-like processes through simulation and synthesis. OE is a significant challenge in the ALife field, focusing on whether systems can continuously generate new and valuable innovations. ### Main Contributions 1. **Summarizing Existing Connections**: Reviewing and summarizing previous connections established between CC and OE. 2. **Discovering New Connections**: Revealing new potential connections through expert discussions that could promote future research. 3. **Identifying Synergies**: Proposing a research agenda aimed at stimulating interdisciplinary collaboration and discussion by combining research on OE and creativity. ### Core Issues - **Conceptual Ambiguity**: Currently, the concepts of OE and creativity are ambiguous within their respective fields, lacking unified definitions and measurement methods. - **Need for Interdisciplinary Collaboration**: Interdisciplinary collaboration can better understand these concepts and develop more effective algorithms and models. ### Conclusion By reactivating the discussion on the relationship between creativity and OE, the paper raises many questions worthy of further research. These questions not only help deepen the understanding of these two concepts but also advance research in related fields.