Abstract:LambdaBeam is a state-of-the-art, execution-guided algorithm for program synthesis that utilizes higher-order functions, lambda functions, and iterative loops within a Domain-Specific Language (DSL). LambdaBeam generates each program from scratch but does not take advantage of the frequent recurrence of program blocks or subprograms commonly found in specific domains, such as loops for list traversal. To address this limitation, we introduce AbstractBeam: a novel program synthesis framework designed to enhance LambdaBeam by leveraging Library Learning. AbstractBeam identifies and integrates recurring program structures into the DSL, optimizing the synthesis process. Our experimental evaluations demonstrate that AbstractBeam statistically significantly (p < 0.05) outperforms LambdaBeam in the integer list manipulation domain. Beyond solving more tasks, AbstractBeam's program synthesis is also more efficient, requiring less time and fewer candidate programs to generate a solution. Furthermore, our findings indicate that Library Learning effectively enhances program synthesis in domains that are not explicitly designed to showcase its advantages, thereby highlighting the broader applicability of Library Learning.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The problem that this paper attempts to solve is the efficiency and performance bottlenecks faced by existing program synthesis methods when dealing with complex tasks. Specifically:
1. **Limitations of LambdaBeam**: Although LambdaBeam effectively generates programs through a bottom - up search strategy, it does not take advantage of the frequently repeated structures of program blocks or sub - programs common in specific domains. This results in the need for more computational resources and time when generating programs.
2. **The problem of combinatorial explosion**: As the length of the program increases, the number of possible program combinations grows exponentially, leading to an overly large search space that is difficult to explore effectively. This "combinatorial explosion" phenomenon limits the effectiveness of DSL (Domain - Specific Language) - based program synthesis methods.
3. **Lack of abstract reuse**: Existing methods such as DreamCoder perform well in terms of library learning, but they rely on specific task clusters where the differences in programs are determined by a single parameter. This makes the discovery of abstractions easy but also limits their generalization ability.
To solve these problems, the author proposes a new framework - AbstractBeam. AbstractBeam combines LambdaBeam's execution - guided bottom - up search strategy and DreamCoder's library learning mechanism, aiming to optimize the program synthesis process by identifying and reusing common program structures. Specific goals include:
- **Improving performance**: Making program synthesis more efficient by reducing program length and search depth.
- **Enhancing generalization ability**: Verifying the applicability and effectiveness of library learning in domains not specifically designed to demonstrate program repeatability.
### Summary of Abstract Content
The paper introduces AbstractBeam, a new program synthesis framework that aims to enhance the functionality of LambdaBeam by introducing a library learning mechanism. AbstractBeam can identify and integrate frequently occurring program structures into the DSL, thereby optimizing the synthesis process. Experimental results show that AbstractBeam significantly outperforms LambdaBeam in the field of integer list operations and also shows broad application potential in other fields not specifically designed to demonstrate its advantages.
### Formula Representation
The formulas and symbols involved in the paper are represented using Markdown format. For example:
- The goal of program synthesis is to generate the corresponding output \(O = \{O_1,..., O_N\}\) from the input \(I = \{I_1,..., I_N\}\), that is, to find a program \(P\in L\), where \(L\) represents the space of all possible programs.
- LambdaBeam generates programs by iteratively selecting operators and their parameters. Each selection is based on the current operator \(f\) and the explored value set \(V\), and the selection process can be represented as:
\[
a_i\sim P(a_i|f, V)
\]
where \(P(a_i|f, V)\) is a probability distribution that guides the beam search algorithm to select the most appropriate parameter \(a_i\).
In this way, the correctness and readability of the formulas are ensured.