A quantitative assessment of Geant4 for predicting the yield and distribution of positron-emitting fragments in ion beam therapy
Andrew Chacon,Harley Rutherford,Akram Mohammadi,Munetaka Nitta,Fumihiko Nishikido,Yuma Iwao,Hideaki Tashima,Eiji Yoshida,Go Akamatsu,Sodai Takyu,Han Gyu Kang,Daniel Robert Franklin,Katia Parodi,Taiga Yamaya,Anatoly B Rosenfeld,Susanna Guatelli,Mitra Safavi-Naeini
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6560/ad4f48
IF: 3.5
2024-05-23
Physics in Medicine and Biology
Abstract:Purpose: To compare the accuracy with which different hadronic inelastic physics models across ten Geant4 Monte Carlo simulation toolkit versions can predict positron-emitting fragments produced along the beam path during carbon and oxygen ion therapy.
Materials and Methods: Phantoms of polyethylene, gelatin or poly(methyl methacrylate) were irradiated with monoenergetic carbon and oxygen ion beams. Post-irradiation, 4D PET images were acquired and parent 11 C, 10 C and 15 O radionuclides contributions in each voxel were determined from the extracted time activity curves. Next, the experimental configurations were simulated in Geant4 Monte Carlo versions 10.0 to 11.1, with three different fragmentation models - binary ion cascade (BIC), quantum molecular dynamics (QMD) and the Liege intranuclear cascade (INCL++) - 30 model-version combinations. Total positron annihilation and parent isotope production yields predicted by each simulation were compared between simulations and experiments using normalised mean squared error and Pearson cross-correlation coefficient. Finally, we compared the depth of maximum positron annihilation yield and the distal point at which positron yield decreases to 50% of peak between each model and the experimental results.
Results: Performance varied considerably across versions and models, with no one version/model combination providing the best prediction of all positron-emitting fragments in all evaluated target materials and irradiation conidiations. BIC in Geant4 10.2 provided the best overall agreement with experimental results in the largest number of test cases. QMD consistently provided the best estimates of both the depth of peak positron yield (10.4 and 10.6) and the distal 50%-of-peak point (10.2), while BIC also performed well and INCL generally performed the worst across most Geant4 versions.
Conclusions: Best spatial prediction of annihilation yield and positron-emitting fragment production during carbon and oxygen ion therapy was found to be 10.2.p03 with BIC or QMD. These version/model combinations are recommended for future heavy ion therapy research.
engineering, biomedical,radiology, nuclear medicine & medical imaging