Abstract:Background: Identification of those at high risk before a fracture occurs is an essential part of osteoporosis management. This topic remains a significant challenge for researchers in the field, and clinicians worldwide. Although many algorithms have been developed to either identify those with a diagnosis of osteoporosis or predict their risk of fracture, concern remains regarding their accuracy and application. Scientific advances including machine learning methods are rapidly gaining appreciation as alternative techniques to develop or enhance risk assessment and current practice. Recent evidence suggests that these methods could play an important role in the assessment of osteoporosis and fracture risk. Methods: Data used for this study included Dual-energy X-ray Absorptiometry (DXA) bone mineral density and T-scores, and multiple clinical variables drawn from a convenience cohort of adult patients scanned on one of 4 DXA machines across three hospitals in the West of Ireland between January 2000 and November 2018 (the DXA-Heath Informatics Prediction Cohort). The dataset was cleaned, validated and anonymized, and then split into an exploratory group (80%) and a development group (20%) using the stratified sampling method. We first established the validity of a simple tool, the Osteoporosis Self-assessment Tool Index (OSTi) to identify those classified as osteoporotic by the modified International Society for Clinical Densitometry DXA criteria. We then compared these results to seven machine learning techniques (MLTs): CatBoost, eXtreme Gradient Boosting, Neural network, Bagged flexible discriminant analysis, Random forest, Logistic regression and Support vector machine to enhance the discrimination of those classified as osteoporotic or not. The performance of each prediction model was measured by calculating the area under the curve (AUC) with 95% confidence interval (CI), and was compared against the OSTi. Results: A cohort of 13,577 adults aged >= 40 yr at the age of their first scan was identified including 11,594 women and 1983 men. 2102 (18.13%) females and 356 (17.95%) males were identified with osteoporosis based on their lowest T-score. The OSTi performed well in our cohort in both men (AUC 0.723, 95% CI 0.659-0.788) and women (AUC 0.810, 95% CI 0.787-0.833). Four MLTs improved discrimination in both men and women, though the incremental benefit was small. eXtreme Gradient Boosting showed the most promising results: +4.5% (AUC 0.768, 95% CI 0.706-0.829) for men and +2.3% (AUC 0.833, 95% CI 0.812-0.853) for women. Similarly MLTs outperformed OSTi in sensitivity analyses-which excluded those subjects taking osteoporosis medications-though the absolute improvements differed. Conclusion: The OSTi retains an important role in identifying older men and women most likely to have osteoporosis by bone mineral density classification. MLTs could improve DXA detection of osteoporosis classification in older men and women. Further exploration of MLTs is warranted in other populations, and with additional data.

Risk Factor Identification In Osteoporosis Using Unsupervised Machine Learning Techniques

Clinical Value of Machine Learning Models in Early Osteoporosis Prediction Based on Demographic and Routine Biochemical Indicators

Unsupervised Machine Learning for Osteoporosis Diagnosis Using Singh Index Clustering on Hip Radiographs

Using machine learning techniques to predict the risk of osteoporosis based on nationwide chronic disease data

A hierarchical opportunistic screening model for osteoporosis using machine learning applied to clinical data and CT images

Enhancing Osteoporosis Detection: An Explainable Multi-Modal Learning Framework with Feature Fusion and Variable Clustering

Identifying frailty‐related clusters of Alzheimer’s and Vascular dementia: A multi‐modal data approach

Comparison between linear regression and four different machine learning methods in selecting risk factors for osteoporosis in a Chinese female aged cohort

A Machine Learning Framework for Screening Plasma Cell-Associated Feature Genes to Estimate Osteoporosis Risk and Treatment Vulnerability

Osteoporosis Pre-Screening Using Ensemble Machine Learning in Postmenopausal Korean Women

A clinical prediction model for 10-year risk of self-reported osteoporosis diagnosis in pre- and perimenopausal women

Machine Learning to Predict Long and Short Term Fracture Risk in Postmenopausal Women

Developing and comparing deep learning and machine learning algorithms for osteoporosis risk prediction

Automated Risk Stratification of Hip Osteoarthritis Development in Patients With Femoroacetabular Impingement Using an Unsupervised Clustering Algorithm: A Study From the Rochester Epidemiology Project

Machine Learning Can Improve Clinical Detection of Low BMD: the DXA-HIP Study

Predicting fracture risk for elderly osteoporosis patients by hybrid machine learning model

Can machine learning predict pharmacotherapy outcomes? An application study in osteoporosis

Osteoporotic hip fracture prediction from risk factors available in administrative claims data – A machine learning approach

Identification of combined biomarkers for predicting the risk of osteoporosis using machine learning

Application of machine learning algorithms to predict osteoporosis in postmenopausal women with type 2 diabetes mellitus

Unsupervised Time-Series Clustering of Left Atrial Strain for Cardiovascular Risk Assessment