Abstract:Deep neural networks (DNNs) have achieved state-of-the-art performance in various learning tasks, such as computer vision, natural language processing, and speech recognition. However, the fundamental theory of generalization still remains obscure in deep learning-why DNN models can generalize well, despite that they are heavily overparametrized in both depth and width? Recently, some work shows that traditional theory of analyzing the generalization error of learning models fails to explain the generalization of DNNs. The failure is mainly because of one simple fact that the worse case analysis of generalization error for learning models would be too loose for models with large parameter space, such as DNNs. In this work, we propose a new analysis of generalization in DNNs from an optimal transport perspective. Unlike traditional worse-case uniform convergence analysis in learning theory, our analysis of generalization error is dependent on both the learning algorithm and the data distribution and is the average-case analysis. Thus, our theory can be more practical and accurate to describe the generalization behavior of DNNs. More specifically, in this article, we try to answer a fundamental yet unsolved question in deep learning-why deeper models can generalize well than shallow models? The main contribution of this article can be summarized in four aspects. First, under a general learning framework, we derive upper bounds on the generalization error of learning algorithms by their algorithmic transport cost: the expected Wasserstein distance between the output hypothesis and the output hypothesis conditioned on an input example. We further provide several upper bounds on the algorithmic transport cost in terms of total variation distance, relative entropy, and Vapnik-Chervonenkis (VC) dimension. Moreover, we also study different conditions for loss functions under which the generalization error of a learning algorithm can be upper bounded by different probability metrics between distributions relating to the output hypothesis and/or the input data. Finally, under our established framework, we obtain our main results, showing that the generalization error in DNNs decreases exponentially to zero as the number of layers increases.

Improving Generalization of Deep Neural Networks by Optimum Shifting

Efficient Loss Landscape Reshaping for Convolutional Neural Networks

Sharpness Minimization Algorithms Do Not Only Minimize Sharpness To Achieve Better Generalization

Penalizing Gradient Norm for Efficiently Improving Generalization in Deep Learning.

Penalizing Gradient Norm for Efficiently Improving Generalization in Deep Learning

When Do Flat Minima Optimizers Work?

Towards Understanding Generalization of Deep Learning: Perspective of Loss Landscapes.

Regularizing Scale-Adaptive Central Moment Sharpness for Neural Networks

Improve Generalization and Robustness of Neural Networks via Weight Scale Shifting Invariant Regularizations

Visualizing the Loss Landscape of Neural Nets

An Optimal Transport Analysis on Generalization in Deep Learning

A Neural Network Transformation based Global Optimization Algorithm

Perturbation Analysis of Neural Collapse

Improving generalization of deep neural networks by leveraging margin distribution

Asymmetric Valleys: Beyond Sharp and Flat Local Minima.

Shrinking-Magnifying Approach: New Exploration For Generalizing Neural Networks

Boosting sharpness-aware training with dynamic neighborhood

Theoretical Issues in Deep Networks: Approximation, Optimization and Generalization

Nonlinear Collaborative Scheme for Deep Neural Networks.

A Convergence Theory Towards Practical Over-parameterized Deep Neural Networks

Sharpness-Aware Training for Free