Lessons to learn for better safeguarding of genetic resources during tree pandemics: the case of ash dieback in Europe

Jan-Peter George,Mari Rusanen,Egbert Beuker,Leena Yrjänä,Volkmar Timmermann,Nenad Potocic,Sakari Välimäki,Heino Konrad
2024-05-22
Abstract:Ash dieback (ADB) is threatening populations of European ash (Fraxinus excelsior & F. angustifolia) for more than three decades. Although much knowledge has been gathered in the recent past, practical conservation measures have been mostly implemented at local scale. Since range contraction in both ash species will be exacerbated in the near future by westward expansion of the emerald ash borer and climate change, systematic conservation frameworks need to be developed to avoid long-term population-genetic consequences and depletion of genomic diversity. In this article, we address the advantages and obstacles of conservation approaches aiming to conserve genetic diversity in-situ or ex-situ during tree pandemics. We are reviewing 47 studies which were published on ash dieback to unravel three important dimensions of ongoing conservation approaches or perceived conservation problems: i) conservation philosophy (i.e. natural selection, resistance breeding or genetic conservation), ii) the spatial scale (ecosystem, country, continent), and iii) the integration of genetic safety margins in conservation planning. Although nearly equal proportions of the reviewed studies mention breeding or active conservation as possible long-term solutions, only 17% consider that additional threats exist which may further reduce genetic diversity in both ash species. We also identify and discuss several knowledge gaps and limitations which may have limited the initiation of conservation projects at national and international level so far. Finally, we demonstrate that there is not much time left for filling these gaps, because European-wide forest health monitoring data indicates a significant decline of ash populations in the last 5 years.
Populations and Evolution
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
### Problems the Paper Attempts to Solve This paper aims to explore how to better protect the genetic resources of European ash (*Fraxinus excelsior*) and narrow-leaved ash (*F. angustifolia*), especially in the context of tree diseases such as ash dieback (ADB). Specifically, the paper focuses on the following aspects: 1. **Conservation Concepts**: Natural selection, resistance breeding, or genetic resource conservation—which method is the best long-term solution to the ash dieback crisis? 2. **Spatial Scale**: Should conservation measures be implemented at the ecosystem, national, or continental scale? 3. **Genetic Safety Margins**: Does the conservation planning consider the potential impact of other ecological threats (such as emerald ash borer invasion or climate change) on genetic diversity? ### Background - **Importance of Ash Trees**: European ash and narrow-leaved ash are important forest tree species with high ecological amplitude, significant economic value, and crucial roles in biodiversity. - **Threat of Ash Dieback**: Since ash dieback was first discovered in Poland in 1992, it has rapidly spread to most parts of Europe, leading to a sharp decline in ash populations. - **Future Challenges**: In addition to ash dieback, these two species also face potential threats from the emerald ash borer and adaptive challenges posed by climate change. ### Main Issues - **Loss of Genetic Diversity**: Due to human-induced habitat fragmentation and the impact of novel diseases, the loss of genetic diversity has become a global issue. - **Effectiveness of Conservation Measures**: Current conservation measures are mostly limited to local scales and lack a systematic conservation framework. - **Urgency**: Forest health monitoring across Europe shows a significant decline in ash populations over the past 5 years, leaving little time to fill knowledge gaps. ### Research Objectives - **Evaluate Existing Research**: Reviewed 47 studies on ash dieback, analyzing the advantages and obstacles of different conservation methods. - **Propose Recommendations**: Discussed the pros and cons of different types of genetic conservation (in situ and ex situ) and proposed future research directions and underutilized resources. ### Conclusion - **Need for Integrated Conservation Strategies**: Combining in situ and ex situ conservation to ensure genetic diversity of ash populations across different temporal and spatial scales. - **Strengthen International Cooperation**: Promote data and knowledge sharing among European countries to accelerate ash conservation efforts. - **Fill Research Gaps**: Further study the distribution of genetic diversity, the time series of population decline, and the impact of biological disasters on genetic diversity loss. Through these efforts, the genetic resources of ash trees can be better protected to meet future ecological and evolutionary challenges.