Abstract:Teaching to improve student models (e.g., knowledge distillation) is an extensively studied methodology in LLMs. However, for humans, teaching improves not only students but also teachers, by fostering more rigorous and clear reasoning as well as knowledge building. We ask: Can LLMs also learn by teaching (LbT) for better reasoning? If the answer is yes, we can potentially unlock the possibility of continuously advancing the models without solely relying on human-produced data or stronger models. In this paper, we provide a preliminary exploration on this question. We show that LbT ideas can be incorporated into existing LLM training/prompting pipelines and bring improvements. Specifically, we design three methods, each mimicking one of the three levels of LbT: observing students' feedback, learning from the feedback, and learning iteratively, with the goals of improving answer accuracy without training or improving models' inherent capability with fine-tuning. We reveal some findings: (1) Teaching materials that make it easier for students to learn have clearer and more accurate logic when using in-context learning as the student's "learning" method; (2) Weak-to-strong generalization: LbT might help improve strong models by teaching weak models; (3) Diversity in students might help: teaching multiple students could be better than teaching one student or the teacher itself. We hope that our exploration can inspire future research on LbT and more broadly adopting the advanced techniques in education to improve LLMs. The code and website are at <a class="link-external link-https" href="https://github.com/imagination-research/lbt" rel="external noopener nofollow">this https URL</a> and <a class="link-external link-https" href="https://sites.google.com/view/llm-learning-by-teaching" rel="external noopener nofollow">this https URL</a>.

Can formal argumentative reasoning enhance LLMs performances?

Critical-Questions-of-Thought: Steering LLM reasoning with Argumentative Querying

Argumentation Computation with Large Language Models : A Benchmark Study

Exploring the Potential of Large Language Models in Computational Argumentation

Argumentative Large Language Models for Explainable and Contestable Decision-Making

"I'd Like to Have an Argument, Please": Argumentative Reasoning in Large Language Models

A general semi-structured formalism for computational argumentation: Definition, properties, and examples of application.

LLM-ARC: Enhancing LLMs with an Automated Reasoning Critic

Can Language Models Recognize Convincing Arguments?

Are LLMs the Master of All Trades? : Exploring Domain-Agnostic Reasoning Skills of LLMs

ArgMed-Agents: Explainable Clinical Decision Reasoning with LLM Disscusion via Argumentation Schemes

LLM Reasoning Engine: Specialized Training for Enhanced Mathematical Reasoning

Evaluating the Impact of Advanced LLM Techniques on AI-Lecture Tutors for a Robotics Course

Exploring the psychology of LLMs' Moral and Legal Reasoning

"Let's Argue Both Sides": Argument Generation Can Force Small Models to Utilize Previously Inaccessible Reasoning Capabilities

Do LLMs Exhibit Human-Like Reasoning? Evaluating Theory of Mind in LLMs for Open-Ended Responses

Enhancing Logical Reasoning in Large Language Models to Facilitate Legal Applications

Can LLMs Fix Issues with Reasoning Models? Towards More Likely Models for AI Planning

Can LLMs Learn by Teaching for Better Reasoning? A Preliminary Study

Can Large Language Models Act as Symbolic Reasoners?