Abstract:Preference alignment in Large Language Models (LLMs) has significantly improved their ability to adhere to human instructions and intentions. However, existing direct alignment algorithms primarily focus on relative preferences and often overlook the qualitative aspects of responses. Striving to maximize the implicit reward gap between the chosen and the slightly inferior rejected responses can cause overfitting and unnecessary unlearning of the high-quality rejected responses. The unawareness of the reward scores also drives the LLM to indiscriminately favor the low-quality chosen responses and fail to generalize to responses with the highest rewards, which are sparse in data. To overcome these shortcomings, our study introduces reward-conditioned LLM policies that discern and learn from the entire spectrum of response quality within the dataset, helping extrapolate to more optimal regions. We propose an effective yet simple data relabeling method that conditions the preference pairs on quality scores to construct a reward-augmented dataset. This dataset is easily integrated with existing direct alignment algorithms and is applicable to any preference dataset. The experimental results across instruction-following benchmarks including AlpacaEval, MT-Bench, and Arena-Hard-Auto demonstrate that our approach consistently boosts the performance of DPO by a considerable margin across diverse models. Additionally, our method improves the average accuracy on various academic benchmarks. When applying our method to on-policy data, the resulting DPO model achieves SOTA results on AlpacaEval. Through ablation studies, we demonstrate that our method not only maximizes the utility of preference data but also mitigates the issue of unlearning, demonstrating its broad effectiveness beyond mere dataset expansion. Our code is available at <a class="link-external link-https" href="https://github.com/shenao-zhang/reward-augmented-preference" rel="external noopener nofollow">this https URL</a>.

SPO: Multi-Dimensional Preference Sequential Alignment With Implicit Reward Modeling

Self-supervised Preference Optimization: Enhance Your Language Model with Preference Degree Awareness

Beyond One-Preference-Fits-All Alignment: Multi-Objective Direct Preference Optimization

Mixed Preference Optimization: Reinforcement Learning with Data Selection and Better Reference Model

Direct Preference Optimization Using Sparse Feature-Level Constraints

Soft Preference Optimization: Aligning Language Models to Expert Distributions

Self-Augmented Preference Optimization: Off-Policy Paradigms for Language Model Alignment

Relative Preference Optimization: Enhancing LLM Alignment through Contrasting Responses across Identical and Diverse Prompts

Aligning Large Language Models via Self-Steering Optimization

MPPO: Multi Pair-wise Preference Optimization for LLMs with Arbitrary Negative Samples

Self-Play Preference Optimization for Language Model Alignment

Pairwise Proximal Policy Optimization: Harnessing Relative Feedback for LLM Alignment

$α$-DPO: Adaptive Reward Margin is What Direct Preference Optimization Needs

RS-DPO: A Hybrid Rejection Sampling and Direct Preference Optimization Method for Alignment of Large Language Models

Ordinal Preference Optimization: Aligning Human Preferences via NDCG

Controllable Preference Optimization: Toward Controllable Multi-Objective Alignment

Cal-DPO: Calibrated Direct Preference Optimization for Language Model Alignment

Adversarial Preference Optimization: Enhancing Your Alignment via RM-LLM Game

General Preference Modeling with Preference Representations for Aligning Language Models

Reward-Augmented Data Enhances Direct Preference Alignment of LLMs

Aligning CodeLLMs with Direct Preference Optimization