Abstract:An excess of flux (i.e. a bump) in the early light curves of type Ia supernovae has been observed in a handful of cases. Multiple scenarios have been proposed to explain this. It has been shown that for at least one object (SN~2018oh) the excess emission observed could be the result of a large amount of $^{56}$Ni in the outer ejecta ($\sim$0.03~$M_{\rm{\odot}}$). We present a series of model light curves and spectra for ejecta profiles containing $^{56}$Ni shells of varying masses (0.01, 0.02, 0.03, and 0.04~$M_{\rm{\odot}}$) and widths. We find that even for our lowest mass $^{56}$Ni shell, an increase of \textgreater2 magnitudes is produced in the bolometric light curve at one day after explosion relative to models without a $^{56}$Ni shell. We show that the colour evolution of models with a $^{56}$Ni shell differs significantly from those without and shows a colour inversion similar to some double-detonation explosions. Spectra of our $^{56}$Ni shell models show that strong suppression of flux between $\sim$3\,700 -- 4\,000~$Å$ close to maximum light appears to be a generic feature for this class of model. Comparing our models to observations of SNe~2017cbv and 2018oh, we show that a $^{56}$Ni shell of 0.02 -- 0.04~$M_{\rm{\odot}}$ can match shapes of the early optical light curve bumps, but the colour and spectral evolution are in disagreement. This would indicate that an alternative origin for the flux excess is necessary. Based on existing explosion scenarios, producing such a $^{56}$Ni shell in the outer ejecta as required to match the light curve shape, without the presence of additional short-lived radioactive material, may prove challenging. Given that only a small amount of $^{56}$Ni in the outer ejecta is required to produce a bump in the light curve, such non-monotonically decreasing $^{56}$Ni distributions in the outer ejecta must be rare, if they were to occur at all.

SN 2019tua : A Type IIb Supernova with Multiple Bumps in the Light Curves

SN 2018hfm: a Low-Energy Type II Supernova with Prominent Signatures of Circumstellar Interaction and Dust Formation

The Luminous and Double-Peaked Type Ic Supernova 2019stc: Evidence for Multiple Energy Sources

SN 2015bf: A fast declining type II supernova with flash-ionized signatures

An investigation of $^{56}$Ni shells as the source of early light curve bumps in type Ia supernovae

The Superluminous Type IIn Supernova ASASSN-15ua: Part of a continuum in extreme precursor mass loss

SN 2015bf: a fast declining type II supernova with flash-ionised signatures

ASASSN-18am/SN 2018gk: an Overluminous Type IIb Supernova from a Massive Progenitor

SN 2018hna: Adding a Piece to the Puzzles of the Explosion of Blue Supergiants

Observations of the very young Type Ia Supernova 2019np with early-excess emission

Signatures of anti-social mass-loss in the ordinary Type II SN 2024bch - A non-interacting supernova with early high-ionisation features

Broad-lined Type Ic Supernova Iptf16asu: A Challenge to All Existing Models

SN 2014C: a metamorphic supernova exploded in the intricate and hydrogen-rich surroundings

SN 2022jli: a type Ic supernova with periodic modulation of its light curve and an unusually long rise

Peculiar Spectral Evolution of the Type I Supernova 2019eix: A Possible Double Detonation from a Helium Shell on a Sub-Chandrasekhar-mass White Dwarf

Fast and Not-so-Furious: Case Study of the Fast and Faint Type IIb SN 2021bxu

SN 2018gk Revisited: the Photosphere, the Central Engine, and the Putative Dust

SN 2019nyk: A rapidly declining Type II supernova with early interaction signatures

Asymmetries and Circumstellar Interaction in the Type II SN 2024bch

The Type Ibn Supernova 2019kbj -- Indications for Diversity in Type Ibn Supernova Progenitors

Broad-lined Type Ic Supernova Iptf16asu: A Challenge to All Popular Models