Spatial Cognition: a Wave Hypothesis

Robert Worden
2024-05-16
Abstract:Animals build Bayesian 3D models of their surroundings, to control their movements. There is strong selection pressure to make these models as precise as possible, given their sense data. A previous paper has described how a precise 3D model of space can be built by object tracking. This only works if 3D locations are stored with high spatial precision. Neural models of 3D spatial memory have large random errors; too large to support the tracking model. An alternative is described, in which neurons couple to a wave excitation in the brain, representing 3-D space. This can give high spatial precision, fast response, and other benefits. Three lines of evidence support the wave hypothesis: (1) it has better precision and speed than neural spatial memory, and is good enough to support object tracking; (2) the central body of the insect brain, whose form is highly conserved across all insect species, is well suited to hold a wave; and (3) the thalamus, whose round shape is conserved across all mammal species, is well suited to hold a wave. These lines of evidence strongly support the wave hypothesis.
Neurons and Cognition,Populations and Evolution
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The paper explores a novel hypothesis that animals construct high-precision models of their surrounding three-dimensional space through a type of wave within the brain and use this model to control all physical movements. The author proposes a perspective different from the traditional neural synapse hypothesis, suggesting that certain neurons may interact with fluctuations within the brain to represent the positions of objects in the surrounding three-dimensional space. The main contributions of the paper include: 1. **Proposing the Wave Hypothesis**: The author believes that, compared to traditional neural storage methods (such as storing information through the random firing rates of neurons), a new mechanism based on fluctuations can provide higher precision, faster response speed, and better multisensory information integration capabilities. These fluctuations can serve as carriers for the positions of objects in short-term memory and support advanced cognitive functions such as object tracking. 2. **Analyzing the Limitations of Neural Spatial Memory**: The author points out that existing neural spatial memory models have limitations in terms of precision and speed, especially in situations requiring rapid processing. These limitations may hinder effective object tracking. For example, when a quick response is needed, the random firing rates of neurons cannot provide sufficient precision. 3. **Providing Evidence Supporting the Wave Hypothesis**: The author provides three main pieces of evidence supporting the wave hypothesis: first, fluctuation storage performs better than neural storage in terms of precision and speed, sufficient to support object tracking; second, the central body in insect brains has a highly conserved morphology suitable for carrying fluctuations; finally, the circular structure of the mammalian thalamus is also suitable for the existence of fluctuations. These three pieces of evidence collectively support the validity of the wave hypothesis. 4. **Discussing the Application Prospects of the Wave Hypothesis**: Although the specific physical nature of the fluctuations has not yet been determined, the author believes that interdisciplinary research from the perspectives of biophysics, genetics, experimental neuroscience, and other disciplines will help reveal the mechanisms of fluctuations in the brain. Additionally, exploring the wave hypothesis is of great significance for understanding how animals achieve efficient spatial cognition. In summary, this paper aims to challenge traditional neuroscience views and proposes a new theoretical framework to explain how animals achieve highly precise cognition of their surrounding three-dimensional space through fluctuations within the brain.