Abstract:Wide-field cosmological surveys provide hundreds of thousands of spectroscopically confirmed galaxy groups and clusters, valuable for tracing baryonic matter distribution. However, controlling systematics in identifying host dark matter halos and estimating their properties is crucial. We evaluate three group detection methods on a simulated dataset replicating the GAMA selection to understand systematics and selection effects. This is key for interpreting data from SDSS, GAMA, DESI, WAVES, and leveraging optical catalogues in the (X-ray) eROSITA era to quantify baryonic mass in galaxy groups. Using a lightcone from the Magneticum hydrodynamical simulation, we simulate a spectroscopic galaxy survey in the local Universe (down to $z<0.2$ and stellar mass completeness $M_{\star}\geq10^{9.8} M_{\odot}$). We assess completeness and contamination of reconstructed halo catalogues, evaluate membership accuracy, and analyse the halo mass recovery rate of group finders. All three group finders achieve high completeness ($>80\%$) at group and cluster scales, confirming optical selection's suitability for dense regions. Contamination at low masses ($M_{200}<10^{13} M_{\odot}$) arises from interlopers and fragmentation. Membership is at least 70\% accurate above the group mass scale, but inaccuracies bias halo mass estimates using galaxy velocity dispersion. Alternative proxies, like total stellar luminosity or mass, yield more accurate halo masses. The cumulative luminosity function of galaxy members matches predictions, showing the group finders' accuracy in identifying galaxy populations. These results confirm the reliability and completeness of spectroscopic catalogues produced by state-of-the-art group finders. This supports studies requiring large spectroscopic samples of galaxy groups and clusters, as well as investigations into galaxy evolution across diverse environments.

Density-based clustering algorithm for galaxy group/cluster identification

The Hierarchical Structure of Galactic Haloes: Classification and characterisation with Halo-OPTICS

Detecting clusters and groups of galaxies populating the local Universe in large optical spectroscopic surveys

COSMIC: A Galaxy Cluster Finding Algorithm Using Machine Learning

Identifying Galaxy Groups at High Redshift from Incomplete Spectroscopic Data – I. the Group Finder and Application to Zcosmos

The Northern Sky Optical Cluster Survey IV: An Intermediate Redshift Galaxy Cluster Catalog and the Comparison of Two Detection Algorithms

Comparison of two optical cluster finding algorithms for the new generation of deep galaxy surveys

Finding Protoclusters to Trace Galaxy Evolution – I. the Finder and Its Performance

Optical galaxy cluster mock catalogs with realistic projection effects: validations with the SDSS redMaPPer clusters

Group-finding with photometric redshifts: The Photo-z Probability Peaks algorithm

Galaxy Groups In The Sdss Dr4. I. The Catalog And Basic Properties

An independent central point OPTICS clustering algorithm for semi-supervised outlier detection of continuous glucose measurements

Testing An Identification Algorithm for Extragalactic OB Associations Using a Galactic Sample

Identification of Superclusters and their Properties in the Sloan Digital Sky Survey Using WHL Cluster Catalog

Mapping the Most Massive Overdensity Through Hydrogen (mammoth). I. Methodology

Self-calibrating optical galaxy cluster selection bias using cluster, galaxy, and shear cross-correlations

Constructing a Galaxy Cluster Catalog in IllustrisTNG-300 using the Mulguisin Algorithm

Clustering and the Search for Dim and Dark Galaxies

Galaxy Groups in the SDSS DR4: I. The Catalogue and Basic Properties

Galaxy Groups in the Low-Redshift Universe

Constructing a Galaxy Cluster Catalog in IllustrisTNG300 Using the Mulguisin Algorithm