Abstract:Group testing is utilized in the case when we want to find a few defectives among large amount of items. Testing n items one by one requires n tests, but if the ratio of defectives is small, group testing is an efficient way to reduce the number of tests. Many research have been developed for group testing for a single type of defectives. In this paper, we consider the case where two types of defective A and B exist. For two types of defectives, we develop a belief propagation algorithm to compute marginal posterior probability of defectives. Furthermore, we construct several kinds of collections of pools in order to test for A and B. And by utilizing our belief propagation algorithm, we evaluate the performance of group testing by conducting simulations.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
This paper discusses how to effectively detect two types of defective items (defectives), namely Type A and Type B, in group testing. Group testing is typically used to identify a small number of defective items from a large number of items, reducing the number of tests required. This method is particularly effective when the proportion of defective items is low.
The main contributions of the paper are as follows:
1. A belief propagation algorithm is proposed to calculate the marginal posterior probabilities of each type of defective item.
2. Several different pooling designs are constructed for detecting A, B, and AB (i.e., either A or B).
3. The performance of these designs in group testing, considering false positive/false negative probabilities, is evaluated through simulation.
The authors point out that in the presence of two types of defective items, conducting separate group testing for A and B would require twice the number of tests compared to testing for a single type. However, by mixing different types of testing pools, a reduction in the number of tests can be expected.
The paper also discusses:
- The classification of group testing, such as noiseless testing and noisy testing, as well as adaptive and non-adaptive testing.
- The detailed steps of the belief propagation algorithm for calculating marginal posterior probabilities.
- Pool designs constructed through finite affine geometry, ensuring unique collinearity conditions to avoid short cycles and improve identification accuracy.
In the experimental section, the false positive and false negative probabilities are fixed, assuming equal occurrence rates for both types of defective items. Multiple simulations were conducted using pool designs generated by 3-dimensional affine geometry (AG(3,7)), and the results showed that certain specific designs (e.g., Design 3) maintained high screening and identification capabilities even at high numbers of defective items, while other designs (e.g., Designs 1, 5, and 6) exhibited lower identification capabilities in certain scenarios, possibly due to the presence of short cycle structures in the designs.
Finally, the paper indicates that future work is needed to improve pool designs and belief propagation algorithms, in order to further enhance the detection performance for the two types of defective items.