Abstract:Large Language Models (LLMs) have excelled in various tasks but are still vulnerable to jailbreaking attacks, where attackers create jailbreak prompts to mislead the model to produce harmful or offensive content. Current jailbreak methods either rely heavily on manually crafted templates, which pose challenges in scalability and adaptability, or struggle to generate semantically coherent prompts, making them easy to detect. Additionally, most existing approaches involve lengthy prompts, leading to higher query <a class="link-external link-http" href="http://costs.In" rel="external noopener nofollow">this http URL</a> this paper, to remedy these challenges, we introduce a novel jailbreaking attack framework, which is an automated, black-box jailbreaking attack framework that adapts the black-box fuzz testing approach with a series of customized designs. Instead of relying on manually crafted templates, our method starts with an empty seed pool, removing the need to search for any related jailbreaking templates. We also develop three novel question-dependent mutation strategies using an LLM helper to generate prompts that maintain semantic coherence while significantly reducing their length. Additionally, we implement a two-level judge module to accurately detect genuine successful jailbreaks. We evaluated our method on 7 representative LLMs and compared it with 5 state-of-the-art jailbreaking attack strategies. For proprietary LLM APIs, such as GPT-3.5 turbo, GPT-4, and Gemini-Pro, our method achieves attack success rates of over 90%,80% and 74%, respectively, exceeding existing baselines by more than 60%. Additionally, our method can maintain high semantic coherence while significantly reducing the length of jailbreak prompts. When targeting GPT-4, our method can achieve over 78% attack success rate even with 100 tokens. Moreover, our method demonstrates transferability and is robust to state-of-the-art defenses. We will open-source our codes upon publication.

PARDEN, Can You Repeat That? Defending against Jailbreaks via Repetition

Multi-round jailbreak attack on large language models

Defensive Prompt Patch: A Robust and Interpretable Defense of LLMs against Jailbreak Attacks

Defending Large Language Models Against Jailbreak Attacks via Layer-specific Editing

A Wolf in Sheep's Clothing: Generalized Nested Jailbreak Prompts can Fool Large Language Models Easily

Prefix Guidance: A Steering Wheel for Large Language Models to Defend Against Jailbreak Attacks

Jailbreaking Large Language Models Against Moderation Guardrails via Cipher Characters

Jailbreaking? One Step Is Enough!

Don't Say No: Jailbreaking LLM by Suppressing Refusal

Playing Language Game with LLMs Leads to Jailbreaking

AdaPPA: Adaptive Position Pre-Fill Jailbreak Attack Approach Targeting LLMs

PathSeeker: Exploring LLM Security Vulnerabilities with a Reinforcement Learning-Based Jailbreak Approach

Shaping the Safety Boundaries: Understanding and Defending Against Jailbreaks in Large Language Models

Jailbreaking Black Box Large Language Models in Twenty Queries

SafeDecoding: Defending against Jailbreak Attacks via Safety-Aware Decoding

RePD: Defending Jailbreak Attack through a Retrieval-based Prompt Decomposition Process

GUARD: Role-playing to Generate Natural-language Jailbreakings to Test Guideline Adherence of Large Language Models

Self-Guard: Empower the LLM to Safeguard Itself

SmoothLLM: Defending Large Language Models Against Jailbreaking Attacks

Making Them Ask and Answer: Jailbreaking Large Language Models in Few Queries via Disguise and Reconstruction

Effective and Evasive Fuzz Testing-Driven Jailbreaking Attacks against LLMs