From an attention economy to an ecology of attending. A manifesto
Gunter Bombaerts,Tom Hannes,Martin Adam,Alessandra Aloisi,Joel Anderson,Lawrence Berger,Stefano Davide Bettera,Enrico Campo,Laura Candiotto,Silvia Caprioglio Panizza,Yves Citton,Diego D'Angelo,Matthew Dennis,Natalie Depraz,Peter Doran,Wolfgang Drechsler,Bill Duane,William Edelglass,Iris Eisenberger,Beverley Foulks McGuire,Antony Fredriksson,Karamjit S. Gill,Peter D. Hershock,Soraj Hongladarom,Beth Jacobs,Gabor Karsai,Thomas Lennerfors,Jeanne Lim,Chien-Te Lin,Mark Losoncz,David Loy,Lavinia Marin,Bence Peter Marosan,Chiara Mascarello,David McMahan,Jin Y. Park,Nina Petek,Anna Puzio,Katrien Schaubroek,Jens Schlieter,Brian Schroeder,Shobhit Shakya,Juewei Shi,Elizaveta Solomonova,Francesco Tormen,Jitendra Uttam,Marieke Van Vugt,Sebastjan Voros,Maren Wehrle,Galit Wellner,Jason M. Wirth,Olaf Witkowski,Apiradee Wongkitrungrueng,Dale S. Wright,Yutong Zheng
2024-10-23
Abstract:As the signatories of this manifesto, we denounce the attention economy as inhumane and a threat to our sociopolitical and ecological well-being. We endorse policymakers' efforts to address the negative consequences of the attention economy's technology, but add that these approaches are often limited in their criticism of the systemic context of human attention. Starting from Buddhist philosophy, we advocate a broader approach: an ecology of attending, that centers on conceptualizing, designing, and using attention (1) in an embedded way and (2) focused on the alleviating of suffering. With 'embedded' we mean that attention is not a neutral, isolated mechanism but a meaning-engendering part of an 'ecology' of bodily, sociotechnical and moral frameworks. With 'focused on the alleviation of suffering' we explicitly move away from the (often implicit) conception of attention as a tool for gratifying desires.
Computers and Society