Abstract:Background: The recent explosion in biological and other real-world network data has created the need for improved tools for large network analyses. In addition to well established global network properties, several new mathematical techniques for analyzing local structural properties of large networks have been developed. Small over-represented subgraphs, called network motifs, have been introduced to identify simple building blocks of complex networks. Small induced subgraphs, called graphlets, have been used to develop "network signatures" that summarize network topologies. Based on these network signatures, two new highly sensitive measures of network local structural similarities were designed: the relative graphlet frequency distance (RGF-distance) and the graphlet degree distribution agreement (GDD-agreement). Finding adequate null-models for biological networks is important in many research domains. Network properties are used to assess the fit of network models to the data. Various network models have been proposed. To date, there does not exist a software tool that measures the above mentioned local network properties. Moreover, none of the existing tools compare real-world networks against a series of network models with respect to these local as well as a multitude of global network properties. Results: Thus, we introduce GraphCrunch, a software tool that finds well-fitting network models by comparing large real-world networks against random graph models according to various network structural similarity measures. It has unique capabilities of finding computationally expensive RGF-distance and GDD-agreement measures. In addition, it computes several standard global network measures and thus supports the largest variety of network measures thus far. Also, it is the first software tool that compares real-world networks against a series of network models and that has built-in parallel computing capabilities allowing for a user specified list of machines on which to perform compute intensive searches for local network properties. Furthermore, GraphCrunch is easily extendible to include additional network measures and models. Conclusion: GraphCrunch is a software tool that implements the latest research on biological network models and properties: it compares real-world networks against a series of random graph models with respect to a multitude of local and global network properties. We present GraphCrunch as a comprehensive, parallelizable, and easily extendible software tool for analyzing and modeling large biological networks. The software is open-source and freely available at http://www.ics.uci.edu/~bio-nets/graphcrunch/. It runs under Linux, MacOS, and Windows Cygwin. In addition, it has an easy to use on-line web user interface that is available from the above web page.

Comparative analysis of graph randomization: Tools,methods, pitfalls, and best practices

Structure matters: Assessing the statistical significance of network topologies

Fifty Years of Graph Matching, Network Alignment and Network Comparison.

An interdisciplinary survey of network similarity methods

Exploring the randomness of directed acyclic networks

Empirical comparison of network sampling techniques

Networks, Random Graphs and Percolation

Random Graph Generator for Bipartite Networks Modeling

Proper network randomization is key to assessing social balance

Comparing the topology of phylogenetic network generators

Random Graph Modeling: A survey of the concepts

On Random Graph Properties

GraphCrunch: a tool for large network analyses

Counterfactual Learning on Graphs: A Survey

Random intersection graphs and their applications in security, wireless communication, and social networks

Monte Carlo Experiments of Network Effects in Randomized Controlled Trials

A Survey of Graph Comparison Methods with Applications to Nondeterminism in High-Performance Computing

Graph sub-sampling for divide-and-conquer algorithms in large networks

A simulated annealing algorithm for randomizing weighted networks

A Comparative Analysis of Approaches to Network-Dismantling.

A comparative analysis of approaches to network-dismantling