Abstract:<span>Computing trajectory similarity is a fundamental operation in movement analytics, required in search, clustering, and classification of trajectories, for example. Yet the range of different but interrelated trajectory similarity measures can be bewildering for researchers and practitioners alike. This paper describes a systematic comparison and methodical exploration of trajectory similarity measures. Specifically, this paper compares five of the most important and commonly used similarity measures: dynamic time warping (DTW), edit distance (EDR), longest common subsequence (LCSS), discrete Fréchet distance (DFD), and Fréchet distance (FD). The paper begins with a thorough conceptual and theoretical comparison. This comparison highlights the similarities and differences between measures in connection with six different characteristics, including their handling of a relative versus absolute time and space, tolerance to outliers, and computational efficiency. The paper further reports on an empirical evaluation of similarity in trajectories with contrasting properties: data about constrained bus movements in a transportation network, and the unconstrained movements of wading birds in a coastal environment. A set of four experiments: a. creates a measurement baseline by comparing similarity measures to a single trajectory subjected to various transformations; b. explores the behavior of similarity measures on network-constrained bus trajectories, grouped based on spatial and on temporal similarity; c. assesses similarity with respect to known behavioral annotations (flight and foraging of oystercatchers); and d. compares bird and bus activity to examine whether they are distinguishable based solely on their movement patterns. The results show that in all instances both the absolute value and the ordering of similarity may be sensitive to the choice of measure. In general, all measures were more able to distinguish spatial differences in trajectories than temporal differences. The paper concludes with a high-level summary of advice and recommendations for selecting and using trajectory similarity measures in practice, with conclusions spanning our three complementary perspectives: conceptual, theoretical, and empirical.</span>

BILTS: A Bi-Invariant Similarity Measure for Robust Object Trajectory Recognition under Reference Frame Variations

Supplementary Material: Quasi-Dense Similarity Learning for Multiple Object Tracking

Improved biharmonic kernel signature for 3D non-rigid shape matching and retrieval

Joint Feature Correspondences and Appearance Similarity for Robust Visual Object Tracking

Shape matching and object recognition using shape contexts

Robust Estimation of Similarity Transformation for Visual Object Tracking

Invariant Descriptors of Motion and Force Trajectories for Interpreting Object Manipulation Tasks in Contact

Describing Local Reference Frames for 3-D Motion Trajectory Recognition

Towards Effective Trajectory Similarity Measure in Linear Time.

A comparative analysis of trajectory similarity measures

Practical Tracking Method based on Best Buddies Similarity

A Robust Part-Based Tracker

Similarity Evaluation of Rigid Body Motion Based on Multiple Features

Point Context: An Effective Shape Descriptor for RST-Invariant Trajectory Recognition

Computing Similarity between a Pair of Trajectories

Motion trajectory recognition using local temporal self-similarities

Motion Segmentation Via Robust Subspace Separation in the Presence of Outlying, Incomplete, or Corrupted Trajectories

Trajectory Space: A Dual Representation for Nonrigid Structure from Motion

Robust Structure-based Shape Correspondence

A Novel Geometric Framework on Gram Matrix Trajectories for Human Behavior Understanding