Evaluating Large Language Models for Material Selection

Daniele Grandi,Yash Patawari Jain,Allin Groom,Brandon Cramer,Christopher McComb
2024-04-24
Abstract:Material selection is a crucial step in conceptual design due to its significant impact on the functionality, aesthetics, manufacturability, and sustainability impact of the final product. This study investigates the use of Large Language Models (LLMs) for material selection in the product design process and compares the performance of LLMs against expert choices for various design scenarios. By collecting a dataset of expert material preferences, the study provides a basis for evaluating how well LLMs can align with expert recommendations through prompt engineering and hyperparameter tuning. The divergence between LLM and expert recommendations is measured across different model configurations, prompt strategies, and temperature settings. This approach allows for a detailed analysis of factors influencing the LLMs' effectiveness in recommending materials. The results from this study highlight two failure modes, and identify parallel prompting as a useful prompt-engineering method when using LLMs for material selection. The findings further suggest that, while LLMs can provide valuable assistance, their recommendations often vary significantly from those of human experts. This discrepancy underscores the need for further research into how LLMs can be better tailored to replicate expert decision-making in material selection. This work contributes to the growing body of knowledge on how LLMs can be integrated into the design process, offering insights into their current limitations and potential for future improvements.
Computation and Language
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The effectiveness of using large language models (LLMs) for material selection in product design is discussed in this paper. The study collected expert material preference data to evaluate whether LLMs can align with expert recommendations and analyzed the impact of different model configurations, prompt strategies, and hyperparameter settings. The study found two failure modes of LLMs in recommending materials and suggested that parallel prompts could improve prompt engineering. Although LLMs can provide assistance, their suggestions often significantly differ from those of human experts, highlighting the need for further research on how to better simulate expert decision-making with LLMs.