Flexible, Freestanding, Ultrasensitive, and Iontronic Tactile Sensing Textile
Peng Wang,Guoxian Li,Jun Liu,Zhanrui Hou,Chuizhou Meng,Shijie Guo
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/acsaelm.1c00170
IF: 4.494
2021-05-04
ACS Applied Electronic Materials
Abstract:Recently, flexible textile-based sensors have drawn great interest due to their promising application in wearable electronics. However, most previous work has been done either by attaching conventional sensors to a textile-based substrate or by sewing fiber-like sensors into fabrics. The use of an additional substrate would interfere with detection performance and to some extent reduce user experience. Herein, we propose a flexible, freestanding tactile sensor by using the MXene/cotton composite thread as electronic electrodes and ionic gel (IG) as an iontronic electrolyte. Two or more such fiber electrodes are crisscross placed and bonded with a small amount of IG as glue at the intersection points to form the sensor unit or array without using any substrate. Due to its supercapacitive sensing mechanism upon optimization of electrode thickness and IG composition, it shows a high sensitivity of 9.62 kPa<sup>–1</sup> (0–40 kPa), ultralow detection limit of 0.884 Pa, and short response time of 24 ms. The sensor is capable of detecting micromotions like pulse beat at the wrist, water dripping, and sound wave through the air. In addition, a 6 × 6 sensor array is demonstrated to acquire 2D pressure mapping with recognition of different object shapes. Moreover, the sensor array can be conformally attached on a complex surface of 3D objects such as a table tennis ball to detect 3D positioned pressures. The proposed tactile-sensing textile in the true sense would provide a concept to develop advanced sensing devices with comfort for wearable systems.The Supporting Information is available free of charge at <a class="ext-link" href="/doi/10.1021/acsaelm.1c00170?goto=supporting-info">https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acsaelm.1c00170</a>.Illustrated preparation process of IG solution; surface morphology comparison of the pristine cotton thread and MXene/cotton thread; cross-sectional morphology comparison of the MXene/cotton thread; digital photo showing the MXene/cotton threads with different diameters (70D, 100D, and 200D); experimental data on the repeatability test; and conductivity comparison of the MXene/cotton composite threads with different diameters of 70D, 100D, and 200D (<a class="ext-link" href="/doi/suppl/10.1021/acsaelm.1c00170/suppl_file/el1c00170_si_001.pdf">PDF</a>)This article has not yet been cited by other publications.
materials science, multidisciplinary,engineering, electrical & electronic