A Game Theoretic Analysis of Validator Strategies in Ethereum 2.0

Chien-Chih Chen,Wojciech Golab

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3659463.3660021

2024-05-07

Abstract:Ethereum 2.0 is the second-largest cryptocurrency by market capitalization and a widely used smart contract platform. Therefore, examining the reliability of Ethereum 2.0's incentive mechanism is crucial, particularly its effectiveness in encouraging validators to adhere to the Ethereum 2.0's protocol. This paper studies the incentive mechanism of Ethereum 2.0 and evaluates its robustness by analyzing the interaction between block proposers and attesters in a single slot. To this end, we use Bayesian games to model the strategies of block proposers and attesters and calculate their expected utilities. Our results demonstrate that the Ethereum 2.0 incentive mechanism is incentive-compatible and promotes cooperation among validators. We prove that a Bayesian Nash equilibrium and an ex ante dominant strategy exist between the block proposer and attesters in a single slot. Our research provides a solid foundation for further analysis of Ethereum 2.0's incentive mechanism and insights for individuals considering participation as a validator in Ethereum 2.0.

Computer Science and Game Theory

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The problem that this paper attempts to solve is to evaluate the effectiveness and robustness of the Ethereum 2.0 incentive mechanism, especially how this mechanism encourages validators to abide by the Ethereum 2.0 protocol. Specifically, the paper models these strategies by analyzing the interactions between block proposers and validators using Bayesian game theory and calculates their expected utilities. The main objective of the research is to prove that within a single time slot, there exists a Bayesian Nash Equilibrium (BNE) and an ex ante dominant strategy between block proposers and validators, thereby proving that the Ethereum 2.0 incentive mechanism is incentive - compatible.

### Main research questions:
1. **Effectiveness of the incentive mechanism**: Evaluate whether the Ethereum 2.0 incentive mechanism can effectively promote validators to abide by the protocol.
2. **Analysis of strategic interactions**: Analyze the strategic interactions between block proposers and validators through Bayesian game theory and explore the possibility of cooperative behavior.
3. **Equilibrium state**: Prove that within a single time slot, there exists a Bayesian Nash Equilibrium and an ex ante dominant strategy between block proposers and validators to ensure the incentive compatibility of the incentive mechanism.

### Research methods:
- **Bayesian game theory**: Used to model the strategic interactions between block proposers and validators.
- **Expected utility calculation**: Evaluate the advantages and disadvantages of different strategies by calculating the expected utilities under different strategies.
- **Equilibrium analysis**: Prove that under specific conditions, cooperation is a Bayesian Nash Equilibrium and an ex ante dominant strategy.

### Research contributions:
1. **Integration of background knowledge**: Summarizes the key information of the Ethereum 2.0 reward, penalty, and cost models.
2. **Application of game theory**: Introduces Bayesian game theory to analyze the behavior and decisions of validators.
3. **Evaluation of the incentive mechanism**: Based on the equilibrium analysis, conclusively proves that the Ethereum 2.0 incentive mechanism is incentive - compatible, providing important guidance for future research.

Through these analyses, the paper provides a solid theoretical basis for understanding the Ethereum 2.0 incentive mechanism and its impact on validator behavior.