Evaluating Eye Movement Biometrics in Virtual Reality: A Comparative Analysis of VR Headset and High-End Eye-Tracker Collected Dataset

Mehedi Hasan Raju,Dillon J Lohr,Oleg V Komogortsev
2024-05-06
Abstract:Previous studies have shown that eye movement data recorded at 1000 Hz can be used to authenticate individuals. This study explores the effectiveness of eye movement-based biometrics (EMB) by utilizing data from an eye-tracking (ET)-enabled virtual reality (VR) headset (GazeBaseVR) and compares it to the performance using data from a high-end eye tracker (GazeBase) that has been downsampled to 250 Hz. The research also aims to assess the biometric potential of both binocular and monocular eye movement data. GazeBaseVR dataset achieves an equal error rate (EER) of 1.67% and a false rejection rate (FRR) at 10^-4 false acceptance rate (FAR) of 22.73% in a binocular configuration. This study underscores the biometric viability of data obtained from eye-tracking-enabled VR headset.
Human-Computer Interaction
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The paper primarily explores the application of eye movement data in biometric authentication within virtual reality (VR) environments and conducts a comparative analysis with data collected from high-end eye trackers. ### Research Background and Objectives - **Research Background**: Personal identity is defined not only by visible biological markers such as facial features and fingerprints but also by subtle behavioral traits like writing habits, voice patterns, and eye movements. In recent years, the use of eye movements for biometric analysis has garnered increasing attention. - **Research Objectives**: - To explore the effectiveness of eye movement-based biometrics (EMB), particularly using data collected with VR headsets equipped with eye-tracking functionality (GazeBaseVR). - To compare the data collected by GazeBaseVR with that collected by high-end eye trackers (GazeBase), with the latter's sampling rate reduced to 250 Hz. - To evaluate the biometric potential of both binocular and monocular eye movement data. ### Key Findings - **GazeBaseVR Dataset** achieved an Equal Error Rate (EER) of 1.67% and a False Rejection Rate (FRR) of 22.73% at a False Acceptance Rate (FAR) of 10^-4 in a binocular configuration, demonstrating the feasibility of using data collected with VR headsets equipped with eye-tracking functionality for biometric authentication. - **Performance Comparison**: Data from the GazeBaseVR binocular configuration outperformed the GazeBaseVR monocular configuration and the downsampled GazeBase dataset (GB-250Hz) in short-term evaluations. Specifically, in terms of EER and d-prime (decisive index), the GazeBaseVR binocular configuration was superior to GB-250Hz. Although the FRR was higher, it indicates the potential of VR-based eye-tracking data as a method for biometric authentication. - **Long-term Comparison**: The biometric performance of all datasets declined over time, but the GazeBaseVR binocular configuration still exhibited a certain level of biometric capability. In summary, this study demonstrates the effectiveness and potential of using binocular eye-tracking data in virtual reality environments for biometric authentication, especially in short-term data evaluations.