General concepts, assumptions, drawbacks, and misuses in kinetic Monte Carlo and microkinetic modeling simulations applied to computational heterogeneous catalysis
Hèctor Prats,Francesc Illas,Ramón Sayós
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/qua.25518
2017-10-20
International Journal of Quantum Chemistry
Abstract:In the present article, we survey two common approaches widely used to study the kinetics of heterogeneous catalytic reactions. These are kinetic Monte Carlo simulations and microkinetic modeling. We discuss typical assumptions, advantages, drawbacks, and differences of these two methodologies. We also illustrate some wrong concepts and inaccurate procedures used too often in this kind of kinetics studies. Thus, several issues as for instance minimum energy diagrams, diffusion processes, lateral interactions, or the accuracy of the reaction rates are discussed. Some own examples mainly based on water gas shift reaction over Cu(111) and Cu(321) surfaces are chosen to explain the different developed topics on the kinetics of heterogeneous catalytic reactions. Kinetic Monte Carlo simulations and microkinetic modeling are two common theoretical approaches to study the kinetics of heterogeneous catalytic reactions. Typical assumptions, advantages, drawbacks, and differences of these two methodologies are presented in this article. Some wrong concepts and inaccurate procedures, too often observed in this kind of kinetics studies, are discussed. Some examples, mainly based on water gas shift reaction over Cu(111) and Cu(321) surfaces, are chosen to illustrate several topics.
chemistry, physical,physics, atomic, molecular & chemical,mathematics, interdisciplinary applications,quantum science & technology