Abstract:This paper presents a set of intersectional feminist principles for conducting equitable, ethical, and sustainable AI research. In Data Feminism (2020), we offered seven principles for examining and challenging unequal power in data science. Here, we present a rationale for why feminism remains deeply relevant for AI research, rearticulate the original principles of data feminism with respect to AI, and introduce two potential new principles related to environmental impact and consent. Together, these principles help to 1) account for the unequal, undemocratic, extractive, and exclusionary forces at work in AI research, development, and deployment; 2) identify and mitigate predictable harms in advance of unsafe, discriminatory, or otherwise oppressive systems being released into the world; and 3) inspire creative, joyful, and collective ways to work towards a more equitable, sustainable world in which all of us can thrive.

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

### Problems the paper attempts to solve This paper aims to address the issues of inequality, non - democracy, exploitation and exclusion in artificial intelligence (AI) research, and proposes a set of methods based on intersectional feminist principles to guide fair, ethical and sustainable AI research. Specifically, the paper attempts to achieve the following goals: 1. **Explain and challenge unequal power in AI research, development and deployment**: - By re - examining the seven basic principles of data feminism and applying them to the AI field, the paper hopes to reveal the power inequality phenomena existing in the design, use and deployment processes of AI technology. These inequality phenomena include inequalities in gender, race, economy, etc., as well as the resulting social structural problems. 2. **Identify and mitigate potential harms in advance**: - The paper emphasizes the importance of identifying and mitigating foreseeable harms before the release of AI systems. These harms may include unfair, discriminatory or oppressive systems that may cause harm to specific groups. 3. **Stimulate creative, enjoyable and collective ways to jointly build a more fair and sustainable world**: - By introducing two new principles - environmental impact and consent - the paper hopes to encourage researchers, developers and policymakers to adopt more responsible and innovative methods to promote a world where all can thrive. ### Specific problems and background - **Gender inequality**: Gender inequality in the AI field is very serious, with under - representation of women, transgender and non - binary individuals, especially in key positions in research and development. - **Concentration of economic and political power**: Large technology companies have increasingly strong control over AI research and applications, leading to a high concentration of resources and benefits, and the commercial interests of these companies often conflict with the public interest. - **Colonial dynamics and exploitation**: There are obvious colonial dynamics in AI research, such as low - paid, traumatic data - labeling jobs being outsourced to economically vulnerable groups in the Global South. - **Environmental impact**: The operation and training of AI systems have a huge impact on the environment, but these impacts are often overlooked. - **Consent and privacy**: The use of AI systems often violates personal privacy, especially in areas such as reproductive health, where personal data becomes a legal weapon. ### Solutions - **Re - examine the principles of data feminism**: The paper re - elaborates the seven basic principles of data feminism and applies them to the AI field to guide fair, ethical and sustainable research practices. - **Introduce new principles**: The paper proposes two new principles - environmental impact and consent - to address the new challenges brought by AI technology. - **Advocate collective action and policy regulation**: The paper calls on governments, research institutions and social organizations to take collective action and formulate relevant policies and regulations to limit the power of large technology companies and protect the public interest. Through these methods, the paper hopes to achieve broader fairness, ethics and sustainability in AI research and applications.

Data Feminism for AI

Data Feminism

Data Feminism: Teaching and Learning for Justice

Feminist AI: Can We Expect Our AI Systems to Become Feminist?

Towards a Feminist Metaethics of AI

Tech workers' perspectives on ethical issues in AI development: Foregrounding feminist approaches

Data Equity: Foundational Concepts for Generative AI

Intersectionality in Artificial Intelligence: Framing Concerns and Recommendations for Action

Data Justice in Practice: A Guide for Developers

Principled Artificial Intelligence: Mapping Consensus in Ethical and Rights-Based Approaches to Principles for AI

The Forgotten Margins of AI Ethics

Factoring the Matrix of Domination: A Critical Review and Reimagination of Intersectionality in AI Fairness

No computation without representation: Avoiding data and algorithm biases through diversity

Data quality dimensions for fair AI

Feminist Human-Robot Interaction: Disentangling Power, Principles and Practice for Better, More Ethical HRI

Algorithmic Fairness and Structural Injustice: Insights from Feminist Political Philosophy

FAIR for AI: An interdisciplinary and international community building perspective

Rethinking Fairness: An Interdisciplinary Survey of Critiques of Hegemonic ML Fairness Approaches

FATE in AI: Towards Algorithmic Inclusivity and Accessibility

Intersectional Fairness: A Fractal Approach

The Principles of Data-Centric AI (DCAI)