Public Computing Intellectuals in the Age of AI Crisis

Randy Connolly

2024-06-20

Abstract:The belief that AI technology is on the cusp of causing a generalized social crisis became a popular one in 2023. While there was no doubt an element of hype and exaggeration to some of these accounts, they do reflect the fact that there are troubling ramifications to this technology stack. This conjunction of shared concerns about social, political, and personal futures presaged by current developments in artificial intelligence presents the academic discipline of computing with a renewed opportunity for self-examination and reconfiguration. This position paper endeavors to do so in four sections. The first explores what is at stake for computing in the narrative of an AI crisis. The second articulates possible educational responses to this crisis and advocates for a broader analytic focus on power relations. The third section presents a novel characterization of academic computing's field of practice, one which includes not only the discipline's usual instrumental forms of practice but reflexive practice as well. This reflexive dimension integrates both the critical and public functions of the discipline as equal intellectual partners and a necessary component of any contemporary academic field. The final section will advocate for a conceptual archetype--the Public Computer Intellectual and its less conspicuous but still essential cousin, the (Almost) Public Computer Intellectual--as a way of practically imagining the expanded possibilities of academic practice in our discipline, one that provides both self-critique and an outward-facing orientation towards the public good. It will argue that the computer education research community can play a vital role in this regard. Recommendations for pedagogical change within computing to develop more reflexive capabilities are also provided.

Computers and Society

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The problems that this paper attempts to solve are: whether the current development of artificial intelligence (AI) technology is triggering a widespread social crisis, and how the academic computing discipline can respond to this potential crisis. Specifically, the paper explores the following aspects:

1. **The Nature of the AI Crisis**:
- The paper analyzes the common concerns about the future of society, politics, and individuals brought about by AI technology. The author believes that AI is not only an ethical issue, but also a political and economic one. It involves power relations, social inequality, and the impact of technology on the labor market.

2. **Educational Responses**:
- The paper explores the possible educational measures that the computing discipline may take in the face of the AI crisis. The author advocates expanding the focus on power relations and proposes a new classification of academic computing practice areas, including traditional instrumental practice and reflective practice.

3. **Self - Reflection and Repositioning of Academic Computing**:
- The author calls for self - reflection and reconfiguration in the academic computing discipline to better respond to the challenges brought by AI. The paper puts forward the concept of "Public Computing Intellectual" as a role model that can provide internal criticism and is oriented towards the public interest.

4. **The Relationship between Technology and Society**:
- The paper emphasizes that the application of AI technology is not only a technical issue, but also involves social structure and power distribution. The author cites multiple examples to illustrate how AI systems give priority to the interests of certain social groups while ignoring or harming the interests of other groups.

5. **Future Prospects**:
- Finally, the paper discusses the impact of AI on future employment, the nature of work, and social inequality. The author points out that AI may exacerbate existing social inequality and proposes the view that a trade - off needs to be made between productivity, economic equality, and ecological sustainability.

In summary, this paper attempts to explore how the computing discipline can respond to this potential social crisis through self - reflection and educational reform by analyzing the social impact of AI technology, and proposes specific action suggestions and conceptual frameworks.