On the weight dynamics of learning networks

Nahal Sharafi,Christoph Martin,Sarah Hallerberg
2024-04-30
Abstract:Neural networks have become a widely adopted tool for tackling a variety of problems in machine learning and artificial intelligence. In this contribution we use the mathematical framework of local stability analysis to gain a deeper understanding of the learning dynamics of feed forward neural networks. Therefore, we derive equations for the tangent operator of the learning dynamics of three-layer networks learning regression tasks. The results are valid for an arbitrary numbers of nodes and arbitrary choices of activation functions. Applying the results to a network learning a regression task, we investigate numerically, how stability indicators relate to the final training-loss. Although the specific results vary with different choices of initial conditions and activation functions, we demonstrate that it is possible to predict the final training loss, by monitoring finite-time Lyapunov exponents or covariant Lyapunov vectors during the training process.
Machine Learning,Chaotic Dynamics
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
This paper primarily discusses the issue of weight dynamic behavior during the learning process of neural networks. The researchers use a mathematical framework of local stability analysis to gain a deeper understanding of the learning dynamics of feedforward neural networks, with a particular focus on the weight update equations in a three-layer network for regression tasks. They demonstrate the applicability of these results to any number of nodes and activation function choices, and analyze stability indicators of network learning by calculating Finite Time Lyapunov Exponents (FTLEs) and Conjugate Lyapunov Vectors (CLVs). The paper mentions that although different initial conditions and activation functions can lead to specific variations in results, the final training loss can be predicted by monitoring the FTLEs during the training process. The authors discovered through numerical simulations that there is a significant association between weight initialization methods, stability indicators, and the final results of the training process (such as training loss). For example, using a wide range of initializations can result in a more extensive distribution of training outcomes, while He initialization tends to form different attractors for loss values. Furthermore, the study also found that variations in stability of different directions in the phase space of the network have a significant impact on training results. The relationship between Lyapunov Exponents and CLVs reveals the potential nonlinear structures that may exist during the network training process, which could aid in predicting training outcomes. For instance, under the ReLU activation function, high loss values are usually associated with at least three positive Lyapunov Exponents, whereas with the tanh activation function, the network tends to have stronger contraction directions and exhibits better stability. In conclusion, this paper aims to provide new insights into understanding and predicting the performance of neural network training processes by analyzing weight dynamics and stability indicators.