Fairness in AI: challenges in bridging the gap between algorithms and law

Giorgos Giannopoulos,Maria Psalla,Loukas Kavouras,Dimitris Sacharidis,Jakub Marecek,German M Matilla,Ioannis Emiris

2024-04-30

Abstract:In this paper we examine algorithmic fairness from the perspective of law aiming to identify best practices and strategies for the specification and adoption of fairness definitions and algorithms in real-world systems and use cases. We start by providing a brief introduction of current anti-discrimination law in the European Union and the United States and discussing the concepts of bias and fairness from an legal and ethical viewpoint. We then proceed by presenting a set of algorithmic fairness definitions by example, aiming to communicate their objectives to non-technical audiences. Then, we introduce a set of core criteria that need to be taken into account when selecting a specific fairness definition for real-world use case applications. Finally, we enumerate a set of key considerations and best practices for the design and employment of fairness methods on real-world AI applications

Computers and Society

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The paper attempts to address the gap between algorithmic fairness and the law. Specifically, the authors aim to identify best practices and strategies for defining and adopting fairness algorithms in real-world systems and use cases. They examine algorithmic fairness from a legal perspective, discussing the legal and ethical viewpoints on bias and fairness, and introduce a range of algorithmic fairness definitions through examples to help non-technical audiences understand the goals of these definitions. Additionally, the authors propose a set of core criteria for selecting specific fairness definitions to apply to real-world use cases and enumerate key considerations and best practices when designing and applying fairness methods.

### Main Objectives of the Paper:
1. **Identify Gaps**: Clarify the existing gaps between algorithmic fairness and the law.
2. **Best Practices**: Propose best practices and strategies for defining and adopting fairness algorithms in real-world systems.
3. **Legal Perspective**: Discuss algorithmic fairness from a legal perspective, incorporating anti-discrimination laws and ethical viewpoints.
4. **Fairness Definitions**: Introduce algorithmic fairness definitions through examples to make them understandable to non-technical audiences.
5. **Core Criteria**: Propose core criteria to consider when selecting specific fairness definitions.
6. **Practical Application**: Enumerate key considerations and best practices when designing and applying fairness methods.

### Background and Motivation:
- **Complexity of Fairness**: Fairness is a multi-dimensional concept with highly complex and context-dependent definitions and implementations.
- **Legal Framework**: Both the European Union and the United States have detailed anti-discrimination legal frameworks, but there are challenges in aligning these laws with algorithmic fairness.
- **Practical Needs**: Algorithmic fairness in practical applications needs to comply with legal requirements while also meeting ethical and societal expectations.

### Main Contributions:
- **Integration of Theory and Practice**: Combine literature from both legal and algorithmic fields to propose a comprehensive framework.
- **Practical Guide**: Provide specific guidance and recommendations for designing and implementing algorithmic fairness in real-world applications.

Through these efforts, the authors hope to bridge the gap between algorithmic fairness and the law, promoting the development of more just and fair AI systems.