Persuasion in Networks: Can the Sender Do Better than Using Public Signals?

Yifan Zhang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2404.18965
2024-04-29
Abstract:Political and advertising campaigns increasingly exploit social networks to spread information and persuade people. This paper studies a persuasion model to examine whether such a strategy is better than simply sending public signals. Receivers in the model have heterogeneous priors and will pass on a signal if they are persuaded by it. I show that a risk neutral or risk loving sender prefers to use public signals, unless more sceptical receivers are sufficiently more connected in the social network. A risk averse sender may prefer to exploit the network. These results still hold when networks exhibit homophily.
Theoretical Economics
What problem does this paper attempt to address?