Salome O. Ighomereho,Ifeoma E. Ezeabasili
Abstract:Public policy decision making has become more complex and complicated in recent times. Some authors have attributed this to the fact that public policy decision makers now have more variables to consider in every decision more than ever before. Others have argued that the rate of civilization, globalization and information technology has made the public to be more enlightened and abreast with the activities of government and so can oppose government decisions if they are unfavourable. This tends to increase government need for more and better information in order to satisfy the public. Consequently, this paper examined the issue of fuel subsidy removal in Nigeria, the impact of the policy on the public as well as the country and the role marketing principles would have played if the Nigerian government had taken some time to investigate what should be done, how it should be done and when it should be done. It also proposed a roadmap for future policies that have direct implications for the general public.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
This paper discusses the role of marketing in public policy decision-making, using the case of fuel subsidy removal in Nigeria as an example. The Nigerian government decided to cancel fuel subsidies in 2012, which sparked nationwide protests and strikes as the majority of the population believed that the removal of subsidies would worsen their economic burden.
The paper argues that public policy decision-making is becoming increasingly complex and requires consideration of more variables, while citizens' awareness of government activities is increasing, making it necessary for governments to have more accurate and timely information for policy formulation. Marketing principles can provide assistance as they focus on identifying and meeting the needs of the public, including customers. However, policymakers often do not have enough time for in-depth research or may have biases during research.
In the case of fuel subsidy in Nigeria, the government claimed that the removal of subsidies was to reduce budget pressures and encourage investment, but the public generally opposed it, believing that the removal would directly lead to an increase in living costs. The paper suggests that if the government applies marketing principles and conducts prior investigations into the public's needs, implementation methods, and timing, it may make policy design and execution more effective. Additionally, the paper proposes a roadmap for future public policy decision-making, especially for policies that directly affect the general public.
The paper analyzes the history of fuel subsidies, pointing out that although subsidies primarily benefit the affluent, previous governments still consider them a social obligation to the economically disadvantaged. However, subsidies have led to an increased burden on government finances and have been subject to abuse. Therefore, the government decided to cancel subsidies with the aim of reducing import costs and promoting investment in downstream industries and the enhancement of local refining capacity.
The paper discusses the pros and cons of subsidy removal. Supporters argue that it will reduce corruption and save funds for infrastructure development and improvement of public services. Opponents are concerned that it may lead to inflation, an increase in unemployment, and exacerbate poverty. The general public believes that the government should address basic issues such as electricity supply and ensure the construction of new refineries before subsidy removal.
In conclusion, the paper aims to address the question of how to better apply marketing principles in public policy decision-making, particularly in policies that involve the broad public interest, such as the removal of fuel subsidies in Nigeria. It explores ways to ensure fairness and effectiveness in decision-making.