Smart Grids Secured By Dynamic Watermarking: How Secure?

Kate Davis,Laszlo B. Kish,Chanan Singh

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219477524500433

2024-03-06

Abstract:Unconditional security for smart grids is defined. Cryptanalyses of the watermarked security of smart grids indicate that watermarking cannot guarantee unconditional security unless the communication within the grid system is unconditionally secure. The successful attack against the dynamically watermarked smart grid remains valid even with the presence of internal noise from the grid. An open question arises: if unconditionally authenticated secure communications within the grid, together with tamper resistance of the critical elements, are satisfactory conditions to provide unconditional security for the grid operation.

Cryptography and Security,Systems and Control

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The problem that this paper attempts to solve is the security issue of the smart grid, especially whether the Dynamic Watermarking (DW) technology can provide unconditional security in the smart grid. Specifically:

1. **Define unconditional security of the smart grid**: The paper first defines unconditional security in the smart grid and explores whether the existing dynamic watermarking technologies can meet this standard.

2. **Analyze the security of dynamic watermarking**: Through a detailed cryptographic analysis of the dynamic watermarking technology, the author points out that the security of this technology depends on the assumption of "restricted attackers", that is, the attackers' computing power and other resources are limited. Therefore, the security provided by dynamic watermarking is conditional and cannot guarantee future security.

3. **Demonstrate the effectiveness of the attack**: To prove this point, the author describes in detail an effective attack method against the smart grid system using dynamic watermarking. By using Digital Twin, an attacker can extract and synthesize false sensor signals with watermarks, thereby bypassing the detection mechanism of dynamic watermarking.

4. **Propose an open question**: Finally, the paper proposes an open question: in the smart grid, whether only unconditional - authentication secure communication and anti - tampering measures for key components are sufficient to provide unconditional security, or whether the entire communication scheme must be unconditionally secure.

### Main Conclusions

The main conclusion of the paper is that the dynamic watermarking technology cannot provide unconditional security for the smart grid. Even in the presence of internal noise, an attacker can still break the dynamic watermarking system through specific methods. Therefore, if unconditional security of the smart grid is to be achieved, more powerful security measures may be required, such as an unconditional - security key exchange protocol (for example, the KLJN scheme or quantum key distribution QKD) and unconditional authentication of the communication between sensors and controllers.

### Formula Summary

- The extraction formula for the dynamic watermarking signal \( N_1(t) \):
\[
N_1(t)=S_1(t) - S_{1\text{DT}}(t)
\]

- The formula for synthesizing the false watermarking signal \( S_{1f}(t) \):
\[
S_{1f}(t)=R_{1f}(t)+K N_1(t)
\]
where \( K \) is the required scaling factor and can be determined according to specific situations. For example:
- When the sensor signal is independent of the voltage, \( K = 1 \).
- When the absolute amplitude of the sensor signal is linearly related to the RMS value of the watermark signal, \( K=\frac{R_{1f}(t)}{R_1(t)} \).

These formulas show how to carry out an attack by extracting and synthesizing watermark signals, further illustrating the limitations of the dynamic watermarking technology.