Abstract:We investigate the issue in determining the significance of candidate transient gravitational-wave events in a ground-based interferometer network. Given the presence of non-Gaussian noise artefacts in real data, the noise background must be estimated empirically from the data itself. However, the data also potentially contains signals, thus the background estimate may be overstated due to contributions from signals. It has been proposed to mitigate possible bias by removing single-detector data samples that pass a multi-detector consistency test from the background estimates. We conduct a high-statistics Mock Data Challenge to evaluate the effects of removing such samples, modelling a range of scenarios with plausible detector noise distributions and with a range of plausible foreground astrophysical signal rates. We consider the two different modes: one in which coincident samples are removed, and one in which all samples are retained and used. Three algorithms were operated in both modes, show good consistency with each other; however, discrepancies arise between the results obtained under the "coincidence removal" and "all samples" modes, for false alarm probabilities below a certain value. In most scenarios the median of the false alarm probability (FAP) estimator under the "all samples" mode is consistent with the exact FAP. On the other hand the "coincidence removal" mode is found to be unbiased for the mean of the estimated FAP. While the numerical values at which discrepancies become apparent are specific to the details of our experiment, we believe that the qualitative differences in the behaviour of the median and mean of the FAP estimator have more general validity. On the basis of our study we suggest that the FAP of candidates for the first detection of gravitational waves should be estimated without removing single-detector samples that form coincidences.

Costless correction of chain based nested sampling parameter estimation in gravitational wave data and beyond

Costless correction of chain based nested sampling parameter estimation in gravitational wave data and beyond

Accelerated nested sampling with $β$-flows for gravitational waves

Phantom-Powered Nested Sampling

Parameter estimation with non stationary noise in gravitational waves data

Generalized Steppingstone Sampling: Efficient marginal likelihood estimation in gravitational wave analysis of Pulsar Timing Array data

Improving the scalability of Gaussian-process error marginalization in gravitational-wave inference

Systematic errors in estimation of gravitational-wave candidate significance

Waveform accuracy and systematic uncertainties in current gravitational wave observations

Tuning neural posterior estimation for gravitational wave inference

A new framework to follow up candidates from continuous gravitational-wave searches

Incorporating waveform calibration error in gravitational-wave modeling and inference for SEOBNRv4

Incorporating model accuracy into gravitational-wave Bayesian inference

Simulation-based Inference for Gravitational-waves from Intermediate-Mass Binary Black Holes in Real Noise

Tempered Multifidelity Importance Sampling for Gravitational Wave Parameter Estimation

Varaha: A promising sampler for obtaining gravitational wave posteriors

On the reliability of parameter estimates in the first observing run of Advanced LIGO

An introduction to Bayesian inference in gravitational-wave astronomy: Parameter estimation, model selection, and hierarchical models

Growing Pains: Understanding the Impact of Likelihood Uncertainty on Hierarchical Bayesian Inference for Gravitational-Wave Astronomy

Eccentricity-induced systematic error on parametrized tests of general relativity: Hierarchical Bayesian inference applied to a binary black hole population

Calibrating approximate Bayesian credible intervals of gravitational-wave parameters