Abstract:Objectives Approximately 80% of people with epilepsy live in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), where limited resources and stigma hinder accurate diagnosis and treatment. Clinical machine learning models have demonstrated substantial promise in supporting the diagnostic process in LMICs without relying on specialised or trained personnel. How well these models generalise to naïve regions is, however, underexplored. Here, we use a novel approach to assess the suitability and applicability of such clinical tools for diagnosing active convulsive epilepsy in settings beyond their original training contexts. Methods We sourced data from the Study of Epidemiology of Epilepsy in Demographic Sites dataset, which includes demographic information and clinical variables related to diagnosing epilepsy across five sub-Saharan African sites. For each site, we developed a region-specific (single-site) predictive model for epilepsy and evaluated its performance on other sites. We then iteratively added sites to a multi-site model and evaluated its performance on the omitted regions. Model performances and parameters were then compared across every permutation of sites. We used a leave-one-site-out cross-validation analysis to assess the impact of incorporating individual site data in the model. Results Single-site clinical models performed well within their own regions, but worse in general when evaluated on other regions (p<0.05). Model weights and optimal thresholds varied markedly across sites. When the models were trained using data from an increasing number of sites, mean internal performance decreased while external performance improved. Conclusions Clinical models for epilepsy diagnosis in LMICs demonstrate characteristic traits of ML models, such as limited generalisability and a trade-off between internal and external performance. The relationship between predictors and model outcomes also varies across sites, suggesting the need to update specific aspects of the model with local data before broader implementation. Variations are likely to be specific to the cultural context of diagnosis. We recommend developing models adapted to the cultures and contexts of their intended deployment and caution against deploying region- and culture-naïve models without thorough prior evaluation. Key points SEEDS collaborators ### Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest. ### Funding Statement Yes ### Author Declarations I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained. Yes The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below: All aspects of the study were approved by the ethics committees of University College London and the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, and by the ethics review boards in each of the participating countries. All participants or guardians gave written informed consent. I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals. Yes I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance). Yes I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable. Yes The authors do not have permission to publicly share the data used. Given the multisite origin of these data, requests for data will require approval from the clinical sites and partner institutions requests can be made to the corresponding author. Queries regarding access to the data in the event the corresponding author is no longer available for contact should be addressed to Charles R Newton (charles.newton{at}psych.ox.ac.uk).

Clinical translation of machine learning algorithms for seizure detection in scalp electroencephalography: systematic review

A sustainable artificial-intelligence-augmented digital care pathway for epilepsy: Automating seizure tracking based on electroencephalogram data using artificial intelligence

An Overview of EEG-based Machine Learning Methods in Seizure Prediction and Opportunities for Neurologists in this Field

EEG-Based Epileptic Seizure Detection Via Machine/Deep Learning Approaches: A Systematic Review

Moving the field forward: detection of epileptiform abnormalities on scalp electroencephalography using deep learning-clinical application perspectives

Supervised Machine Learning and Deep Learning Techniques for Epileptic Seizure Recognition Using EEG Signals—A Systematic Literature Review

Assisting Schizophrenia Diagnosis Using Clinical Electroencephalography and Interpretable Graph Neural Networks: a Real-World and Cross-Site Study

Machine Learning for Predicting Epileptic Seizures Using EEG Signals: A Review

A comprehensive study of machine learning-based methods to predict epileptic seizures

AI-Based Electroencephalogram Analysis in Rodent Models of Epilepsy: A Systematic Review

Evaluating the generalisability of region-naïve machine learning algorithms for the identification of epilepsy in low-resource settings

Noninvasive mobile EEG as a tool for seizure monitoring and management: A systematic review

Biological plausible algorithm for seizure detection: Toward AI-enabled electroceuticals at the edge

EEG datasets for seizure detection and prediction— A review

Differentiating Epileptic and Psychogenic Non-Epileptic Seizures Using Machine Learning Analysis of EEG Plot Images

Role of machine learning in the management of epilepsy: a systematic review protocol

Machine Learning Methods Applied to Cortico-Cortical Evoked Potentials Aid in Localizing Seizure Onset Zones

The Application of Deep Learning to Electroencephalograms, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, and Implants for the Detection of Epileptic Seizures: A Narrative Review

An algorithm for seizure onset detection using intracranial EEG

Optimizing Electrode Configurations for Wearable EEG Seizure Detection Using Machine Learning

Machine learning applications on neuroimaging for diagnosis and prognosis of epilepsy: A review