Assumption-lean falsification tests of rate double-robustness of double-machine-learning estimators
Lin Liu,Rajarshi Mukherjee,James M. Robins
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconom.2023.105500
IF: 3.363
2023-08-21
Journal of Econometrics
Abstract:The class of doubly robust (DR) functionals studied by Rotnitzky et al. (2021) is of central importance in economics and biostatistics. It strictly includes both (i) the class of mean-square continuous functionals that can be written as an expectation of an affine functional of a conditional expectation studied by Chernozhukov et al. (2022b) and the class of functionals studied by Robins et al. (2008). The present state-of-the-art estimators for DR functionals ψ are double-machine-learning (DML) estimators (Chernozhukov et al., 2018a). A DML estimator ψ̂1 of ψ depends on estimates p̂(x) and b̂(x) of a pair of nuisance functions p(x) and b(x) , and is said to satisfy "rate double-robustness" if the Cauchy–Schwarz upper bound of its bias is o(n−1/2) . Rate double-robustness implies that the bias is o(n−1/2) , but the converse is false. Were it achievable, our scientific goal would have been to construct valid, assumption-lean (i.e. no complexity-reducing assumptions on b or p ) tests of the validity of a nominal (1−α) Wald confidence interval (CI) centered at ψ̂1 . But this would require a test of the bias to be o(n−1/2) , which can be shown not to exist. We therefore adopt the less ambitious goal of falsifying, when possible, an analyst's justification for her claim that the reported (1−α) Wald CI is valid. In many instances, an analyst justifies her claim by imposing complexity-reducing assumptions on b and p to ensure "rate double-robustness". Here we exhibit valid, assumption-lean tests of H0 : "rate double-robustness holds", with non-trivial power against certain alternatives. If H0 is rejected, we will have falsified her justification. However, no assumption-lean test of H0 , including ours, can be a consistent test. Thus, the failure of our test to reject is not meaningful evidence in favor of H0 .
economics,social sciences, mathematical methods,mathematics, interdisciplinary applications